Do the degrees of freedom change for particles in a relativistic system?

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
Consider one particle traveling at a relativistic velocity in 3-space. Then the configuration space of the system consisting of that one particle would have 3 degrees of freedom – 1 particle times 3 dimensions.

Because of its high energy, the particle decays into, say, 2 particles. Now the configuration space of the system has 6 degrees of freedom.

Is the above correct?

But, the 2 particles are now entangled in position (as well as momentum). So does the configuration space truly have 6 degrees of freedom, or something less than that due to position correlation between the 2 particles?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
Consider one particle traveling at a relativistic velocity in 3-space. Then the configuration space of the system consisting of that one particle would have 3 degrees of freedom – 1 particle times 3 dimensions.
For a relativistic particle, there are two invariants: the mass and the (total) spin. For simplicity, let's suppose we're talking about a spinless particle. Then, although it might seem like there's 4 degrees of freedom (1 energy and 3 momenta), these are constrained by the relativistic mass relation:
<br /> M^2 ~=~ E^2 - |{\mathbf P}|^2<br />
so there's really only 3 degrees of freedom. The equation above defines the "mass hyperboloid", or "mass shell" for the particle.

Because of its high energy, the particle decays into, say, 2 particles. [...]
Total energy and total momentum are both conserved. This places further constraints on any particles that might emerge from a decay, thus reducing the degrees of freedom applicable to such situations.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top