Degrees of freedom of quantum fields and elementary particles

Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
They say that a photon has two degrees of freedom, its two polarization states.

Does that also mean that the electron has only two degrees of freedom, its two spin states?

What about the frequency of a photon, is that not a degree of freedom? Or the three space directions that a electron can travel? What mans degree of freedom anyway when referring to elementary particles and its quantum fields?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These degrees of freedom are those over and above those of energy/momentum. For free particles, the latter give three additional quantities (three directions of momenta plus the total energy but minus one because of the relationship between total energy, total momentum and the particle's mass).

An electon does also have only two possible spin states, though this arises from different equations than those which govern photons. By contrast, W and Z bosons each have three polarisation states as they are massive.

In general the degrees of freedom correspond to whatever quantum numbers the particle has. In some cases this depends on what you define as being the 'same' particle. For example, if you define an up quark generically as a single particle then it has three colour states, whereas if you define uR, uB and uG as separate particles then obviously they don't indiviudally have that particular freedom. The former approach itends to be used when considering symmetries, particularly unbroken ones such as the colour states of quarks or spin polarisations. It's important to be clear what one is doing.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top