DeMorgan's Law extended to Union AND Intersection

SpaceDomain
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hello.

We all know that DeMorgan's Law is as follows:
(A∪B)' = A'∩B'
and
(A∩B)' = A'∪B'
where ' refers to the complement of a set and A and B are both sets.

We also know that this can be extended to more than two terms.

My question is whether or not the following is true:
(A∩B∪C)' = A'∪B'∩C'


Here is my logic:
(A∩B∪C)' = ((A∩B)∪C)' = (A∩B)'∩C' = A'∪B'∩C'
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes that's right. You can reassure yourself by drawing a Venn diagram in which A and B are intersecting circles, dividing the Venn box into four regions counting the region outside both circles. Then draw C as a blob that intersects all four regions.

By the way, I would write A∩B∪C as (A∩B)∪C because the leftmost precedence of operators is not universally understood or accepted for set operators, and
(A∩B)∪C is not in general equal to A∩(B∪C).
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
((A∩B)∪C)' ≡ ((A∪C)∩(B∪C))'
≡ (A∪C)'∪(B∪C)'
≡ (A'∩C')∪(B'∩C')
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top