A Dependence of loss factor tan(δ) upon H in MnZn ferrites

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter H Tomasz Grzybowski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the applicability of the formula Δ(tan(δ)) = ηB⋅ΔB⋅μe for MnZn ferrites, specifically regarding the constant ηB as a hysteresis material constant. Participants are questioning the limits of this formula when using ferrites with an initial permeability (μi) of around 2000. There is a particular interest in determining the magnetic field strength (H) at which the loss factor tan(δ) increases linearly with magnetic flux density (B). Additionally, members are sharing links to ferrite datasheets for further insights. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the relationship between these variables in practical applications.
H Tomasz Grzybowski
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
There is ηB constant given as a hysteresis material constant.
But there is the question: what is the limit of applicability
of the formula Δ(tan(δ)) = ηB⋅ΔB⋅μe?
In particular I think I want to use ferrite with μi = 2000 or so.
Up to what H value will tan(δ) increase linearly with B ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
H Tomasz Grzybowski said:
There is ηB constant given as a hysteresis material constant.
But there is the question: what is the limit of applicability
of the formula Δ(tan(δ)) = ηB⋅ΔB⋅μe?
In particular I think I want to use ferrite with μi = 2000 or so.
Up to what H value will tan(δ) increase linearly with B ?
Can you post links to the ferrite datasheets that you've been reading to try to answer this question? Thanks.
 
Here is a link to ferrite data sheet: http://www.cosmoferrites.com/Downloads/Alnh/CF139.pdf
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top