Derivation of angular acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the expression for angular acceleration, specifically α = mgr / (I + mr²), related to a mass m falling while attached to a frictionless wheel spinning in the horizontal plane. Participants express confusion over the lack of context and details about the problem, particularly regarding the setup and forces involved. Clarification reveals that the scenario involves a mass falling from a height, which affects the gravitational potential energy and the rotational dynamics of the wheel. The key to solving the problem lies in applying Newton's second law to both the wheel and the falling mass, integrating their motions. Understanding the geometry and mechanics of the system is crucial for deriving the correct acceleration.
nicolem10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Derive the expression \alpha=\frac{mgr}{I+mr^{2}}for the acceleration a=\alphar of the falling mass m
I don't even know what this question is asking...
Any ideas on how to approach this wonderful little puzzle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody?
 
nicolem10 said:
Derive the expression \alpha=\frac{mgr}{I+mr^{2}}for the acceleration a=\alphar of the falling mass m
That's all the information given? I presume this is a mass in freefall, in which case the translational acceleration is g, but it would appear that it is rotating as well.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, yes. Can you figure out even which one is supposed to be derived or am I supposed to get one from the other? I'm really confused.
 
Please post the full problem! I can't believe that that's all you were given. There must be some context. You have the rotational inertia and mass of what? :wink:

Just by looking at the equation, I could make up a problem for which that would be the answer. But I'd rather see the actual problem.
 
Look at - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/rotq.html#rq,

one sees that the definition of tangential acceleration is at = \alphar.

Now I am wonder if this problem is about a mass 'falling' in a circular arc, so it starts at a height of r, which gives a gravitational potential energy of mgr for a height of r above the bottom of the arc.

At the moment, that's all I can think of off the top of my head.
 
Last edited:
Here's one idea: An object (rotational inertia I) rotates freely about a horizontal axis through its center of mass. A mass m is attached such that it is a horizontal distance r from the axis. What's the acceleration of the "falling" mass?
 
OK I can clarify this much.

We did a lab. There was a frictionless wheel spinning in the horizontal plane. there was a string attached to the wheel and we timed different masses falling from a specified height.

The question involves no numbers, they just want us to derive the acceleration...

Sorry this is really stupid and I'm just not getting it.
 
nicolem10 said:
There was a frictionless wheel spinning in the horizontal plane. there was a string attached to the wheel and we timed different masses falling from a specified height.
That's better. Just apply Newton's 2nd law to both the wheel and the falling mass. Combine the resulting equations and you can solve for the acceleration. What forces act on each?
 
  • #10
We did a lab. There was a frictionless wheel spinning in the horizontal plane. there was a string attached to the wheel and we timed different masses falling from a specified height.
That's a vital piece of information! The wheel is spinning in the horizontal plane and the masses were falling, so presumably there is a frictionless (or nearl so) pulley over which the string is pulled?
 
  • #11
I suspect that the wheel is the pulley. They wound a string around the wheel, attached a mass, and let it drop.
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
I suspect that the wheel is the pulley. They wound a string around the wheel, attached a mass, and let it drop.
I would have thought so if the wheel was spinning in the vertical plane, but the new information states the wheel is spinning horizontally, so I imagined the string to be traveling horizontally which would require another pulley somewhere if the string is tied to a falling mass. I was trying to visualize the geometry.
 
  • #13
Oops, you're right it does say "horizontal plane". I just assumed that he meant to write horizontal axis. But either way will work.
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Oops, you're right it does say "horizontal plane". I just assumed that he meant to write horizontal axis. But either way will work.
Yeah - it's the same thing, but it was a vital piece missing in the OP. The falling mass at r makes all the difference.
 
Back
Top