Derive an expression for the radial charge distribution of an E field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an expression for the radial charge distribution from the electric field. Participants confirm the cancellation of certain terms in the del equation due to the unidirectional nature of the electric field. This leads to the simplified equation for the divergence of the electric field. The application of Gauss's law is discussed, specifically isolating the charge density, ρ(r), to derive an expression. The final result obtained is ρ(r) = 2E₀ε₀/r, which is validated by other participants.
Jaccobtw
Messages
163
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
Consider a spherical distribution of charge that creates a uniform, radial electric field described by: ##\vec{E}=E_o\hat{r}##

Use the differential form of Gauss's Law to derive an expression for the radial charge distribution, ##\rho##, that will create this field. You will need the divergence in spherical coordinates: ##\nabla \cdot \vec{V}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 V_r)+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\theta}}(\sin[{\theta}]V_{\theta})+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\phi}}(V_{\phi})##
Enter your mathematical expression for ρ(r) in terms of ##\epsilon_o, E_o ##, and ##r##
Relevant Equations
$$\nabla \cdot \vec{V}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 V_r)+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\theta}}(\sin[{\theta}]V_{\theta})+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\phi}}(V_{\phi}) $$
I know we're supposed to attempt a solution but I'm honestly super confused here. I think the second an third terms of the del equation can be cancelled out because there is only an E field in the r hat direction, so no e field in the theta and phi directions. That leaves us with ##\nabla \cdot \vec{E}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 E_r)##. The question says to write an expression for ##\rho (r)##. I know gauss' law has the differential form of itself equaling ##\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}##. would you isolate ##\rho## to get an expression for ##\rho (r)##? Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jaccobtw said:
I think the second an third terms of the del equation can be cancelled out because there is only an E field in the r hat direction, so no e field in the theta and phi directions.
Yes.

Jaccobtw said:
That leaves us with ##\nabla \cdot \vec{E}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 V_r)##.
The symbol ##V_r## on the right side would be better written as ##E_r##.

Jaccobtw said:
The question says to write an expression for ##\rho (r)##. I know gauss' law has the differential form of itself equaling ##\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}##. would you isolate ##\rho## to get an expression for ##\rho (r)##?
Yes. See what you get.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Jaccobtw
TSny said:
Yes.The symbol ##V_r## on the right side would be better written as ##E_r##.Yes. See what you get.
Thank you. I got ##\frac{2 E_o \epsilon_o}{r}##
 
Jaccobtw said:
Thank you. I got ##\frac{2 E_o \epsilon_o}{r}##
Looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Jaccobtw
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top