Deriving Equation of Reduced Mass W/ Angular Momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for reduced mass using angular momentum concepts. The original poster presents a problem involving the angular momentum of a system consisting of an electron and a nucleus, where distances from the center of mass are key to the derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between angular momentum and the distances of the electron and nucleus from the center of mass. There are attempts to express these distances in terms of the total separation and the masses involved. Questions arise about the correct expressions for these distances and the implications of balancing moments about the center of mass.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various approaches to express the distances from the center of mass. Some guidance has been provided on how to set up equations based on moments and the total distance, but there is no explicit consensus on the final expressions or methods to derive the reduced mass.

Contextual Notes

Participants note challenges related to their backgrounds in engineering and physics, which may affect their understanding of the concepts involved. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in defining the reference points for the distances involved in the problem.

Dgray101
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive m*= mM/(m+M) *hint* total angular momentum Iω=m*r2ω equals the sum of the individual angular momenta, where r = re + rn; re and rn are the distances of the electron and nucleus respectively from the center of mass.

Homework Equations



Angular Momentum = mvr
Conservation of Angular momenta
m=mass of electron
M=mass of nucleus

The Attempt at a Solution



m*r2ω = m(re)2ω + M(rn)2ω

I write out this equation but algebraically I can't seem to solve for m* properly so I must be missing something :/ sorry about the notation in the equation I am still learning how to properly use the tools in the message figure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write expressions for re and rn in terms of r, given that they are determined by the location of the center of mass.
 
So like m*r2ω = m(r-rn)^2 ω + M(r-re)^2 ω ?
 
Forget the angular velocity for the moment. The distances re and rn from the center of mass can be determined entirely by the masses and the total separation r.

Given m and M and r, what are those distances?
 
I have no idea :/ my guess is it has something to do with the gravitation equations. But I never took anything with this in first year because I was in engineering :/ not the normal physics stream.
 
I think that if you've done engineering you can find the center of mass given two objects and their separation. What's the distance of each from that center of mass?
 
I didn't do that well in engineering mechanics because it was my first year, and wasn't expecting it to be so brutal :/ but if I recall

Center of Mass = (1/M+m) *( (mre) + (Mrn) ) ?
 
Dgray101 said:
I didn't do that well in engineering mechanics because it was my first year, and wasn't expecting it to be so brutal :/ but if I recall

Center of Mass = (1/M+m) *( (mre) + (Mrn) ) ?

You've got the right idea, but there needs to be some reference point from which re and rn are measured for the expression to make sense. Since it's the center of mass itself that we want as the reference point, things would need adjusting.

I'll suggest another way to approach the problem. You want to get expressions for re and rn in terms of r and the masses m and M. So look at it as if it were two objects of mass M and m on a massless rod in a uniform gravitational field. You want to find the lengths re and rn from the pivot point where the system will be balanced:

attachment.php?attachmentid=63907&stc=1&d=1384365198.gif


Write an expression for the moments about the pivot point. That's one equation. For the other, use the fact that r is the sum of re and rn. Solve for re and rn.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 1,089
so... I had said that the sum of the moments about the center of mass would be...

remg - rnmg = r(m+M)g (I think anyways)

which becomes r(m+M) = Mrn + mre

Would it be helpful to perhaps take out a factor of mM in this case on the right hand side?
 
  • #10
Dgray101 said:
so... I had said that the sum of the moments about the center of mass would be...

remg - rnmg = r(m+M)g (I think anyways)
No, the moments need to balance for equilibrium. The right hand side should be zero (no net torque).

Then use the fact that the sum of the distances is r to write a second equation. Solve for re and rn.
 
  • #11
Oh okay so remg - rnMg = 0

re = (rnM) / m

Then pluging that into the sum of re and rn --> r = (M+m)rn / m

So now could we sub r into the original equation in the problem statement and solve for m*?
 
  • #12
Dgray101 said:
Oh okay so remg - rnMg = 0

re = (rnM) / m

Then pluging that into the sum of re and rn --> r = (M+m)rn / m

So now could we sub r into the original equation in the problem statement and solve for m*?

You don't want to replace r in the angular momentum equation, you want to replace both ##r_e## and ##r_n## in that expression.

So rearrange your equation above to isolate ##r_n##. Then solve for ##r_e## in a similar fashion. You should end up with two expressions:

rn = <something involving r,M,n only>

re = <something involving r,M,n only>

Those expressions will replace re and rn in your angular momentum equation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K