Deriving taylor series for v/c and gamma

warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The velocity of a proton relative to
our galaxy is vp/c = 1-(0.5*10^20), i.e. almost one. Such protons are actually observed.

When velocity it very nearly one \gamma is very large. 1/\gamma
is very small. Use Taylor series to show that for v almost one we have

v/c\approx1-(1/2)(1/\gamma^{2})...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I haven't done Taylor series for about a year now, and I don't quite remember how to do it. The teacher gives us some basic info on the mathematics needed to do the homework, but I can't seem to figure out a relationship. I've also looked for explanations of taylor series relevant to my question, but I haven't found anything
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, express v/c as a function of 1/γ2. Then expand that function as a Taylor series about 1/γ2=0.

f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + f''(0)x2/2! + f'''(0)x3/3! + ...
 
I imagine that you could also just do a taylor expansion on gamma and it would give you similar results, though I have to admit I haven't looked into it. This is just what's normally done.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top