Deriving the Planck Length, Time, and Mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the Planck length, Planck time, and Planck mass, exploring the nature of these units and their relationship to fundamental constants and measurement standards in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Planck units can be understood similarly to how the Newton is defined in terms of force, suggesting that they arise from arbitrary definitions of unit length, mass, and time.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the values of the constants c, \hbar, and G are influenced by the choice of base units, proposing that these constants could be set to 1 if different base units were chosen.
  • A participant questions whether the Planck units are a logical outgrowth of previous scientific results or merely a standard, indicating a conceptual perspective on their nature.
  • Further elaboration suggests that while the Planck units can be seen as conceptual, they can also be treated as standards when measuring fundamental constants using existing measurement apparatus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the Planck units are fundamentally derived from scientific results or simply standards, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the dependence of the Planck units on the choice of base units and the implications of measuring fundamental constants in relation to temporary standards, highlighting the complexity of the topic.

Saketh
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
How are the Planck length, Planck time, and Planck mass "derived"?

I know their values, but I don't understand where we get them from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's similar to how the "Newton" was chosen to be exactly the force that would accelerate 1 kg of mass at a rate of 1 m/s2. in the SI or cgs systems, they start with a sort of arbitrary (from a universal POV) definition of unit length, unit mass, and unit time, and given those definitions, they naturally derive a unit of velocity, unit momentum, unit force, unit energy, etc.

then, given that set of units (pre-1960) physicists went out and measured a bunch of stuff including 3 universal constants intrinsic to free-space, that is the speed of E&M propagation [itex]c[/itex], Planck's constant [itex]\hbar[/itex], and the universal gravitational constant [itex]G[/itex].

remember that these constants take on the numbers that they do because of the 3 arbitrary base units we came up with to measure them. so if we chose to, we could choose the 3 base units (and adjust the consequential derived units) so that those three constants [itex]c[/itex], [itex]\hbar[/itex], and [itex]G[/itex] all take on the value "1" in terms of those units. that is what Planck units are.

check it out in the Wikipedia. at least the hard-core POV pushers haven't f*cked that one up too much.
 
I once saw a problem which asked to "derive" the Planck units. Your explanation makes sense -- that the units are just a standard -- but are the units a logical outgrowth of a previous scientific result? Or are they nothing more than a standard?
 
Saketh said:
I once saw a problem which asked to "derive" the Planck units. Your explanation makes sense -- that the units are just a standard -- but are the units a logical outgrowth of a previous scientific result? Or are they nothing more than a standard?

the units are more "conceptual" than a standard, although i suppose one could treat them as a standard if they want to have a Cavendish-like apparatus for measuring [itex]G[/itex], a Watt-balance for measuring [itex]\hbar[/itex] and a Michaelson-like thing (including a mirror on a mountain some distance away) for measuring [itex]c[/itex] in terms of existing temporary standards like a cesium-clock, platinum-iridium prototype meter bar, and prototype mass. if we measure these constants in terms of the temporary standards, then we can say how those temp standards stack up in relation to the Planck units.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K