Deriving the time dilation? equation of Lorentz transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lorentz time equation, specifically t'=(t-(ux/c^2))/sqrt(1-(u/c)^2), to understand its intuition. The user has attempted to isolate t' using the equations related to Lorentz transformations but is struggling with substitutions and isolating variables. A suggested approach involves visualizing the scenario with a photon bouncing between mirrors on a moving train, comparing the time taken in both the train's frame and an outside observer's frame. The invariance of the speed of light is emphasized as a key concept in deriving the equation. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of visualization and diagrammatic representation in grasping the underlying principles of time dilation.
fignewtons
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It is not an official question but a request for pointers. I am trying to derive the Lorentz time equation to understand the intuition behind it. My math skills are not very good so it might be an obvious question for you. Please see below for my attempt.
The variables are x, t in one inertial reference frame and x', t' in another inertial reference frame. c is the speed of light, γ is the gamma factor, and u is the relative velocity of the primed IRF, from the perspective the unprimed one.
The official equation (the end solution I want to get) is:
t'=(t-(ux/c^2))/sqrt(1-(u/c)^2)

Homework Equations


I'm using the equations:
γ=1/sqrt(1-(u/c)^2)
x'=γ(x-ut)
x=γ(x'+ut')

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I've been able to isolate t' from the equation x=γ(x'+ut') up to this state:
t'=((x/γ)-x')/u
I've tried substituting ct for x, substituting γ for 1/sqrt(1-(u/c)^2), and other substitutions that by now I've forgotten. It doesn't seem to come to the format I want in the official equation, mainly because I can't seem to isolate t in the RHS or get rid of the u in the denominator. I've been stuck on it for days :( I hope this makes sense!

Any attempts to explain the intuition behind this equation/help me visualize it is welcome too, I've asked my instructor on it but somehow he seems shocked I would ask this question and told me to just try to derive it...

Thanks for reading this over, hope everything actually makes sense!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good way to "derive" this equation is to visualize it on paper by a series of diagrams.

First consider a train moving at a speed v < c along the x direction. Inside the train is a set of mirrors on the ceiling and floor between which a photon is bouncing up and down in the frame of reference off the train. (Ignore absorption of photon etc.)
In a given time t the photon will bounce from the bottom to the top back to the bottom, and travel a given distance d, and will travel at c.If there were a "stationary" observer outside the train watching the photon, it would take a given time t' for the photon to travel from the bottom to the top to the bottom again, and it would cover a given distance d', and it would still move at a speed c.

Draw these two scenarios and use Pythagoras, and note that c is the same in both frames (invariance of the speed of light in any inertial frame) and you will "derive" your answer.
After this try developing the result from your given equations.

Here is a link to this sort of thought experiment, but I urge you to try it and visualize it yourself first before looking at the link.
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/srelwhat.html
 
t'=((x/γ)-x')/u
and substitute x'=γ(x-ut) in the above equation.
After simplifying i think you can get t'=(t-(ux/c^2))/sqrt(1-(u/c)^2)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top