Deriving Velocity Expression for Angular Impulse in Polar Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter littleHilbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the velocity expression \(\dot{\vec{r}}=\dot{r}+\frac{l^2}{m^2r^2}\), where \(l\) represents angular impulse. Participants clarify that the expression cannot simply equate \(\dot{\vec{r}}^2\) to \(\dot{r}^2\) without considering angular momentum, as this would imply \(l=0\), which is incorrect. The correct formulation involves recognizing the role of polar coordinates in the derivation, leading to the expression \(\dot{\vec{r}}^2=\dot{r}^2+\left(\frac{l}{mr}\right)^2\). The conversation highlights the importance of understanding angular momentum and its implications in polar coordinates. Ultimately, the participants arrive at a clearer understanding of the relationship between linear and angular motion.
littleHilbert
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hey guys!

I've got a question. How do we get this expression for the velocity:

\dot\vec{r}=\dot{r}+\frac{l^2}{m^2r^2}, where l is the angular impulse of force

I thought we could do it like this:
{\vec{l}}^2=l^2=(\vec{r}\times{m\dot\vec{r}})^2=m^2|\vec{r}|^2|\dot\vec{r}|^2-(\vec{r}\bullet{m\dot\vec{r}})^2=<br /> m^2r^2{\dot\vec{r}}^2-(\vec{r}\bullet{m{\dot\vec{r}})^2
We can't simply write:{\dot\vec{r}}^2={\dot{r}}^2, since then l=0. But why? Which rule forbids that equality. Similarly we can't treat the scalar product above as we would wish to. So how should one proceed in this case?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
littleHilbert said:
Hey guys!

I've got a question. How do we get this expression for the velocity:

\dot\vec{r}=\dot{r}+\frac{l^2}{m^2r^2}, where l is the angular momentum
Where do you get this expression from? The units of L^2/m^2r^2 are m^2/sec^2[/tex] so this cannot be correct.<br /> <br /> It should be:<br /> <br /> \dot\vec{r}^2=\dot{r}^2+\left(\frac{l}{mr}\right)^2<br /> <br /> AM
 
Oh, Jesus sorry...I meant (anglular) impulse of force of course! :)...I've corrected it.
 
littleHilbert said:
We can't simply write: {\dot\vec{r}}^2={\dot{r}}^2, since then l=0. But why? Which rule forbids that equality.

\vec{r} = r\hat{r}
\implies \dot \vec{r} = \frac{d}{dt} (r\hat{r}) = r\frac{d \hat{r}}{dt} + \frac{dr }{dt} \hat{r} = r \dot \theta \hat{\theta} + \dot r \hat{r}
 
Last edited:
Ahhh! Of course - polar coordinates! I've got it now!
Thanks guys! :-)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top