Hey, dude! You've obviously used a process of reverse osmosis to extract the essential issue of this thread.

From here on, the discussion probably belongs in the Earth sub-section, but I'll write this for now, anyway, and assume the thread will be moved.
I understand your arguments for the insignificance of desalinization. Here are my counter-arguments.
1) Fresh water that is evaporated from our oceans and seas has been more or less stable for the past few billion years. As a result, the sea life has adapted to the equilibrium of natures evaporation cycle. Therefore, natural sea evaporation has a net effect of zero and can effectively be dismissed since ocean life is adapted for this evaporation.
2) The amount of fresh water naturally evaporated from the oceans and seas occures over ever square centimeter of the oceans and seas. Even though there's an immense quantity of water evaporated, no single area is responsible for the bulk of the loss. Maybe there's a little more in some areas than others, but again, that's been established for a very long time and local sea life has adjusted appropriately.
In contrast, human desalination plants are
very localized, and to places that are only near the shore, where significant amounts of marine life are found. So, although the net salt content in our oceans and seas is essentially unchanged, the parts that
are changed are critical areas that will have an effect on the sea life there.
Currently, there aren't a whole lot of these plants around. But people are really pushing to make more as a way to offset our dwindling fresh water supplies,. This makes issues like these important.