Detect planets through mag field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter japam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Planets
AI Thread Summary
Detecting exoplanets through their magnetic fields is considered plausible, as these fields extend significantly beyond the planet itself, potentially making them easier to identify with radio telescopes. However, not all exoplanets possess substantial magnetic fields; a liquid core is typically necessary for detection. There is speculation that indirect methods could be employed, such as observing disturbances in the electromagnetic field of the central star when planets are present compared to stars without planets. The discussion raises questions about whether astronomers have already explored these methods. Overall, the feasibility of using magnetic fields for exoplanet detection remains an intriguing area of research.
japam
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Is plausible to use the magnetic field of an exoplanet to detect it?
Since the field extends much more over space than the body planet it could be much more easy to detect with a radiotelescope
i ever wondered if astronomers have not tried it already
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not all the planets have significant magnetic fiels... the planet must have a liquid core to be possible the detection...
 
or maybe can be detected indirectly , looking at disturbances in the central star's electromagnetic field ,compared with a no-planets star?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top