Determination of signs in basic capacitance problems

AI Thread Summary
In capacitance problems involving coaxial cables, the sign of the capacitance can vary based on the chosen charge convention for the conductors. The core can be assigned a positive charge Q and the outer conductor a negative charge -Q, or vice versa, leading to different signs in the calculated capacitance. However, the absolute value of the capacitance remains the same regardless of the sign convention used. The key is to maintain consistency in the charge assignments throughout the calculations to ensure the potential difference V is positive when integrating from the negatively charged conductor to the positively charged one. Ultimately, while the sign may change, the physical interpretation of capacitance remains valid as long as the conventions are applied consistently.
Mr_J
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In my electromagnetics textbook ("Fundamentals of Engineering Electromagnetics" by DK Cheng) there is a typical problem with capacitance, conductors and cylindrical or spherical symmetry which pops up with different variations several times in the problems section of the electrostatics chapter. It goes something like this:

"The radius of the core and the inner radius of the outer conductor of a very long coaxial cable are ri and r0, respectively. The space between the conductors is filled with a layer of dielectric with dielectric constant epsilon. Deterimine the capacitance per unit length."

Now, I am able to solve this problem and get an answer which is identical with the one given in the book, but with one exception: my answer frequently has the "wrong" sign.

My question, then, is: is there a "right" or "wrong" sign for the capacitance in the above problem? In my calculations, the sign in the answer changes if I switch the signs for the charges in the two conductors in the cable (in the solution of the problem you can either set the core to charge Q and the outer conductor to -Q -- where Q is positive -- or, you could set the core to -Q and the outer conductor to Q). Is there a way for me to determine what the signs of the charges of the conductors really are? Does it really matter?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you calculate the potential difference V, you want to integrate along a path that goes from the negatively charged conductor to the positively charged conductor so that V comes out positive.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top