Determine depth of a well using the speed of sound

AI Thread Summary
To determine the depth of a well using the time it takes for a stone to hit the water and the sound of the splash to travel back, the total time of 4.68 seconds is divided into two parts: the fall time of the stone and the sound travel time. The equations used include the speed of sound (340 m/s) and the kinematic equation for the stone's fall under gravity. A mistake was identified regarding the sign convention in the calculations, which led to incorrect results. After correcting the sign error, the correct depth of the well was found to be 95.0 meters. Proper attention to detail in calculations is crucial for accurate results in physics problems.
slurik
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If you drop a stone into a deep well and hear a splash 4.68s after dropping the stone, how far down is the water level? Neglect air resistance and assume that the speed of the sound in air is 3.40x10^2 m/s

Homework Equations


v=d/t
d=v1t+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I had a shot at:

for sound:
v=d/t
d=vt
d=340t

for the stone:
d=v1t+1/2at^2
d=0(4.86s)+1/2(-9.8m/s^2)(4.86-t)^2

for the system:
d=d
so:
340t=1/2(-9.8m/s^2)(4.68-t)^2
340t=-4.9m/s^2 (t^2-9.36t+21.9024)
340t=-4.9t^2+45.864t-107.32176
0=-4.9t^2-294.136t-107.32176

Using that quadratic, I substitute it into the quadratic formula and obtain 2 extraneous solutions:
t=-59.6606...s or t=-0.367sI can see that the amount of time it will take the sound to reach the observers ear is very small in comparison to the amount of time it will take the rock to fall to the bottom. as such, I expect t to be very small since sound is traveling at 340m/s. also I noticed that 1/2at^2 is = approx 107m. The best result I have come up with is 124m, which exceeds the above mentioned result.

The solution sheet says 95.0m

*slams head into desk*

Please help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a sign mistake. The lefthand side is positive when t>0 while the righthand side is negative because you used a=-9.8 m/s^2.
 
Gah! Thanks so much. Sometimes signs get the better of me when I've been working a long time. I have found the solution. Many thanks again! Time for a break perhaps.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top