Determine speed needed to cause rollover of car hitting ramp

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the speed required for a car to rollover after hitting a ramp, considering factors like mass, center of gravity height, and ramp dimensions. The initial approach involves calculating the time to traverse the ramp and the vertical velocity of the car's right side as it elevates. The challenge arises in estimating the car's moment of inertia and whether the angular acceleration post-ramp is constant, which affects the use of rotational equations. Suggestions include treating the car as a rigid body, potentially as a thin rectangular slab, to estimate the moment of inertia. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding static stability angles and energy conservation in rollover dynamics.
Trzebs
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

So my issue is as follows: You have a car going at a constant speed and the right side of the car hits a ramp which causes that side to elevate and cause the car to rotate about its x axis. What I need to figure out is how fast does the car need to hit the ramp to cause a rollover? Assume you know the car's mass (1300 kg), velocity (60. kph), c.g. height( .684 m) and front track width (1.5 m), also you know the length of the ramp (4.5 m) and its height at the take off point (0.9m).

My first tackle at this was to find the time it takes the car to travel the distance of the ramp. Knowing this I could figure out the time it takes for the right side of the car to go from ground level up to the ramp height. With the time and vertical distance of the ramp known I used two of the equations of constant acceleration to determine the vertical velocity of the right side of the vehicle. I treated this vertical velocity as a tangential velocity with the left set of tires as a pivot point. Using v = r*(omega) I was able to find the angular velocity of the vehicle at the top of the ramp. Now at this point I wanted to use either the energy equations of rotation to determine if the car's angular velocity would cause it to reach a tipping point, or the equations of constant acceleration for rotation, but the problem I ran into was not knowing the moment of inertia of the car and also not knowing if the angular acceleration after leaving the ramp is constant which would dictate if I could use the constant acceleration equations again. Is there some aspect I'm failing to consider that would help in this situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh and the way I determine a roll is if the car achieves its SSA (static stability angle) which relates a car's c.g. height and track width (track width = the distance from the center of one front tire to the center of the other front tire). SSA is defined as arctan((t/2)/h) where t = vehicle track width, and h is the c.g. height.
 
Estimate the moment of inertia? Presumably you know the dimensions of the car and perhaps the height of the CoG?

Another possibility is to ignore the rotational aspect and treat it like a ball being thrown up into the air and apply conservation of energy.
 
Last edited:
CWatters said:
Estimate the moment of inertia? Presumably you know the dimensions of the car and perhaps the height of the CoG?

Another possibility is to ignore the rotational aspect and treat it like a ball being thrown up into the air and apply conservation of energy.
The dimensions are indeed known, as well as the cg
CWatters said:
Estimate the moment of inertia? Presumably you know the dimensions of the car and perhaps the height of the CoG?

Another possibility is to ignore the rotational aspect and treat it like a ball being thrown up into the air and apply conservation of energy.
Yes, the dimensions are known as well as the cg height. How would you suggest estimating the moment of inertia? Treat as a known rigid body like maybe a rectangle perhaps?
 
Yes. I'd suggest a relatively thin rectangular slab.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top