Diameter of a wire with length, resistance and resistivity

Elka
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question is about the heated front windscreen of a car
The heater consists of resistance wires which are embedded in the glass

A) The power of the heater needs to be 180W for a satisfactory demisting
A car battery of Negligable internal resistance supplies 12V to operate on the heated screen

Calculate the current required to deliver a power of 180W
180/12=15A

Show that the resistance of the heater when operating is about 1ohm
12/15=0.8 ohms, rounded up=1ohm

B) the heater consists of 200 wires inside the glass
These wires are connected in parallel to the 12V supply

Each of the 200 wires has a length of 0.70m and a resistance R(subscript)p of 160 ohms
The material of the wire has resistivity p=6.0x10^-7ohmic metres

Calculate the DIAMETER of the wire

please people, I don't want the answer, can someone just help me out and give me the equation I need to use? I'm terrible at remembering equations I really need the equation, thanks x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Elka! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Resistance = resistivity times length over cross-section area. :wink:
 
Thank you Tiny Tim! Thats great! You've helped me pick up 4 marks definitely and maybe 5! (past papers homeworks) Thank you so much, you're a lifesaver :D
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top