Did I do the nodal analysis right?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the accuracy of nodal analysis calculations for finding I(x). The initial equations derived for the nodes were corrected after recognizing the polarity of the voltage source, leading to updated values of V1 and V2. The participant also explored using Cramer's Rule and substitution methods, confirming consistency in results. Additionally, they attempted mesh analysis but initially miscalculated I(x) due to an incorrect assumption about its relationship with the mesh currents. Ultimately, the correct relationship was established, confirming I(x) as -0.1A.
asdf12312
Messages
198
Reaction score
1
can someone confirm i did this rite:

Homework Statement


Find I(x)
1zgxh14.png


Homework Equations


see the next part please

The Attempt at a Solution


16jhp47.png

using nodal analysis method i have 2 nodes and these are the equations i got for each, after simplification:

V1: (5/2)V1-V2=21
V2: (5/2)V2-V1=10.5

Using cramer's law, this is matrix i got when i plugged in above equations:

| 5 -2 | |V1| = |42|
| -2 5 | |V2| = |21|

V1=[(42*5)-(21*-2)/(5*5)-(-2*-2)]=12V
V2=[(5*21)-(-2*42)/(5*5)-(-2*-2)]=9V

now recognize that I(x)=V2/10, i got I(x)=0.9A.

so my question is two-part: 1st, did i do this rite? 2nd, is there easier way to solve for I(x)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you'll want to check the polarity of the 10.5V source, then verify your equations.

With only two equations in two unknowns it may be faster to solve by substitution rather than fire up the Cramer's Rule machinery :smile:
 
yeah your rite, i didnt see that. since the sign of the 10.5 is opposite all i have to do is negate the 21 in the matrix. so solving i get V1=8 and V2=-1. so I(x)=-0.1A?


and btw i did do substitution to check my answer but i wanted to try out cramer's rule to see that i could do it correctly. and in my 1st try i did get the same answers for both methods.
 
asdf12312 said:
yeah your rite, i didnt see that. since the sign of the 10.5 is opposite all i have to do is negate the 21 in the matrix. so solving i get V1=8 and V2=-1. so I(x)=-0.1A?
That looks better :smile:
and btw i did do substitution to check my answer but i wanted to try out cramer's rule to see that i could do it correctly. and in my 1st try i did get the same answers for both methods.
Well that's fine then.
 
my teacher wants me to solve I(x) with mesh analysis so i can prove i can use another method to get the same answer, however I'm having trouble. would apreciate if u could tell me what i am doing wrong:

mesh 1: 15(I1)-10(I2)=21
mesh 2: -10(I1)+25(I2)-10(I3)=0
mesh 3: -10(I2)+15(I3)=10.5

i am going under the assumption that I(x) is equal to -I3. my matrix is:

|15 -10 0| |I1)=|21|
|-10 25 -10| |I2|=|0|
|0 -10 15| |I3|=|10.5|

but when i solve this, i get a weird answer, 1.9A for I3. and I know I(x) is supposed to be -0.1A. can u tell me what i am doing wrong??
 
Last edited:
It would appear that the problem lies with your assumption about Ix; Ix is comprised of a suitable sum of the two mesh currents that flow through it.
 
thanks your rite, i got it. I(x)=I2-I3=1.8-1.9=-0.1A
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top