Dielectric and Parallel Plate Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
To determine the work required to remove the Mylar from a parallel plate capacitor, the initial capacitance with the dielectric is 4.0 nF, and the potential difference is 120 V. The capacitance without the dielectric is calculated as 4.0 nF divided by the dielectric constant (κ = 3.1), resulting in approximately 1.29 nF. The potential energy with the dielectric is found to be 28,880 nJ, but the user struggles to calculate the potential energy without the dielectric. The charge on the plates remains constant, which is crucial for finding the potential difference after the Mylar is removed.
opprobe
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.0-nF parallel plate capacitor with a sheet of Mylar (κ = 3.1) filling the space between the plates is charged to a potential difference of 120 V and is then disconnected. (The initial capacitance including the dielectric is 4.0 nF.)

(i) How much work is required to completely remove the sheet of Mylar from the space between the two plates?

(ii) What is the potential difference between the plates of the capacitor once the Mylar is completely removed?

Homework Equations



Q=CV
C=kA(Epsilon_0)/d
-W=Uf-Ui
U = (Q^2)/2C = C(V^2)/2 = QV/2

The Attempt at a Solution



Capacitance w/ dielectric = 4.0 nF
Capacitance w/o dielectric = (4.0 nF)/κ = (4.0 nF)/3.1

Potential Energy w/ dielectric = [(4.0 nF)(120 V)^2]/2 = 28,880 nJ



And...I don't know how to calculate the Potential Energy w/o the dielectric. Can someone point me to the right direction?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
opprobe said:
And...I don't know how to calculate the Potential Energy w/o the dielectric. Can someone point me to the right direction?

If the charge remains the same on the plates (where could it have gone?), and you know the capacitance value...
 
Thank you so much! I can't believe I completely forgot the definition of a capacitor...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top