Difference between a spinning sphere and rolling one

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences in kinetic energy contributions of a spinning sphere versus a rolling sphere as they move down a slant and through a loop. It explores the concepts of translational and rotational kinetic energy, particularly in the context of their moments of inertia and the definitions of rotation centers.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where a sphere rolls down a slant and enters a loop, questioning the nature of its rotational kinetic energy as it travels around the loop.
  • Another participant clarifies that the rotational kinetic energy is due to the ball spinning around its center, but notes that one can decompose kinetic energy in various ways depending on the chosen center of rotation.
  • A participant presents the equations for moments of inertia for both a particle on a circular trajectory and a sphere spinning around its own center, proposing a total kinetic energy expression that includes both forms of rotation.
  • Another participant challenges the previous claim by stating that the first two terms in the proposed kinetic energy equation are identical, suggesting that they represent the same movement along the circular path.
  • A later reply acknowledges the mistake in accounting for the kinetic energy terms, expressing gratitude for the correction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the decomposition of kinetic energy and the treatment of rotational motion, indicating that the discussion remains contested without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of rotational kinetic energy and the implications of different centers of rotation on the total kinetic energy calculations.

Gabriel Maia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
Consider this: We have a sphere rolling down a slant, released from some height h with null velocity. At the end of the slant its potential energy will have been fully converted to kinetic energy, part translational and part rotational.

Now consider this: at the end of the slant the ball enters a loop. As it travels around the loop reaching its top it will have a potential energy, alright, but more importantly for our present problem, it will have again a translational and a rotational kinetic energy. The rotational part is due to the ball spinning around its center (as it rolls along its path) or is it due to the rotation around the loop's center? Shouldn't be 2 rotationa kinetic energies?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gabriel Maia said:
The rotational part is due to the ball spinning around its center
This is how it's usually defined, but you can decompose the KE any way you like. Note that the moment of inertia will depend on the center you chose.
 
I see...

But the moment of inertia of a particle on a circular trajectory is I = m R^2 (where R is the trajectory radius) and the moment of inertia of a sphere spinning around its own center is I = \frac{2}{5} m r^2(where r is the sphere radius). So the total kinetic energy will be

K = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 + \frac{1}{2} mR^2 \omega^2 + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{2}{5}mr^2\right]\omega'^2?

(where \omega is the angular speed of the ball around the loop and \omega'^2 around itself)
 
Gabriel Maia said:
I see...

But the moment of inertia of a particle on a circular trajectory is I = m R^2 (where R is the trajectory radius) and the moment of inertia of a sphere spinning around its own center is I = \frac{2}{5} m r^2(where r is the sphere radius). So the total kinetic energy will be

K = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 + \frac{1}{2} mR^2 \omega^2 + \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{2}{5}mr^2\right]\omega'^2?
No, you are accounting twice for the movement along the circular path. The first two terms are identical, and represent the same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gabriel Maia
Splendid, how foolish of me. Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K