Difference between conductors and empty space

AI Thread Summary
In conductors, charges can move freely, leading to a zero electric field inside over time, while in empty space, there are no charges to rearrange, which means the electric field can exist. The presence of an electric field in empty space requires nearby charges to produce it. If charges are balanced, they may tend to move to eliminate the electric field, but energy barriers can slow this process. Additionally, different interactions may affect positive and negative charges differently, causing imbalances. Consequently, charge buildup can occur due to various processes, such as friction, affecting how charges behave in different materials.
carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
Inside a conductor, as opposed to inside an insulator, charges are free to move around and reposition themselves, which causes that, if we wait a long enough time, the electric field inside them will be zero.

But in an empty space there's nothing (by definition) that can stop charges from rearranging themselves in the same manner. So what's the difference between conductors and empty space, and why is the electric field not zero on the latter?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In empty space, there are no charges to move around. So if there is a non-zero electric field there has to be some stuff around to be the charge that produces the electric field.

So suppose you have some lumps of matter with charges. And then between the matter lumps you have some empty space. You could have an electric field in the empty space.

Now if the electric charges are, overall, balanced plus for minus, they will have some tendency to move to get rid of the electric field. But suppose the charges are a bunch of plus charges on this lump of stuff, and a bunch of negative charges on this other lump. To get from one to the other they would have to get off the lump they start on.

That may require they get over some kind of energy barrier. For example, they may be lower energy on the lump than they would be 1 mm above the lump. They might be lower energy overall if the could move to the other lump. But they have to get over some kind of "speed bump" to get off the lump they start on. If some process or characteristic (such as an orbit for example) is keeping the lumps apart, then the charge balancing might not be all that easy.

So in general, the charge balancing movement could be very slow.

Another possibility is, some processes may affect negative charges (such as electrons) differently to how it affects positive charges (such as atomic nuclei). The larger mass positive charges could get left behind when the electrons get pushed around. Examples might be thermal processes and electromagnetic fields. It is possible that a charge could be built up by different effects on negative or positive charges. As long as this process is acting you might have a charge. Think of the usual example of friction on some such object as glass, plastic, or fur.
 
  • Like
Likes carllacan
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top