Difference between R[[X]] and R[x]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Applejacks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between R[[X]], the formal power series, and R[X], the polynomial ring. R[[X]] includes series with infinitely many non-zero coefficients, such as f(X) = ∑(n=0 to ∞) (X^n/n!), while R[X] consists solely of polynomials with finitely many non-zero coefficients. Examples provided include 1+x and 3+2x+x^3, which belong to R[X]. The series (1 - X)^{-1} is highlighted as a valid element of R[[X]], demonstrating the nature of formal power series independent of convergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of formal power series and polynomial rings
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and summation
  • Knowledge of convergence concepts in series
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of formal power series in R[[X]]
  • Study the implications of convergence in series and its relation to R[X]
  • Investigate the application of (1 - X)^{-1} in combinatorial contexts
  • Learn about generating functions and their connection to power series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra, and anyone interested in the theoretical foundations of power series and polynomial functions.

Applejacks
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Not so much a question. Rather, I don't quite understand the concept.

R[[X]] is the formal power series a0 + a1x + a2x^2...
R[X] consists of all elements in R[[X]] which have only finitely many non-zero coefficients.


Can someone give me an example? Would, say, two different elements of R[[X]] be 1+x and 3+2x+x^3 and hence both of these polynomials would be in R[X]? When does R[[X]] ever have infinitely many non-zero coefficients?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about something like
$$f(X)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{X^n}{n!}?$$ It would be an element of R[[X]] but not R[X] as it's clearly not a polynomial.
 
Ok that clears it up. I wasn't too sure if we could take a formal power series to n=infinity, which leads me to another question. If the n! was in the numerator instead, for the example you provided,would we get the same result (element of R[[X]] but not R[X])?
 
Applejacks said:
Ok that clears it up. I wasn't too sure if we could take a formal power series to n=infinity, which leads me to another question. If the n! was in the numerator instead, for the example you provided,would we get the same result (element of R[[X]] but not R[X])?

Yes. They are only formal power series. When looking at R[[X]], we do not care about convergence. So \sum n!X^n is a perfectly valid element of R[[X]].
 
One interesting feature is that (1 - X)^{-1} is an element of R[[x]]. In particular,

(1 - X)^{-1} = 1 + X + X^2 + X^3 + X^4 + \cdots = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} X^i

You can check this fact by multiplying the right hand side by 1-X.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K