Difference in work done to move magnet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of separating a neodymium magnet from a steel plate, comparing the forces required when applying axial force versus sliding the magnet. It is established that while the work done remains constant due to the conservative nature of the magnetic force, the force required to separate the magnet is lower when sliding it off the edge of the metal. The analogy of climbing a hill illustrates that while the total work done is the same, the force exerted varies based on the path taken. The inquiry seeks a quantitative analysis of the differences in force and work between these two methods of separation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic forces, particularly with neodymium magnets
  • Basic principles of work and energy in physics
  • Knowledge of conservative forces and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector displacement and its implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of magnetic force and its applications in engineering
  • Study the principles of work and energy conservation in conservative forces
  • Explore quantitative methods for calculating forces in magnetic interactions
  • Investigate the effects of friction on the separation of magnets from surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in the practical applications of magnetism and force dynamics in mechanical systems.

akashverma
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
If a neodymium magnet sticks over a steel plate and you want to separate them, it is advised to apply force such that the magnet slips over steel plate.
So I was just wondering what would be the quantified decrement of this force as compared to the case when force is applied axially to separate them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force or work?

I believe the work should be the same in both cases. The force might be lower when sliding the magnet off the edge of the metal. I don't fancy doing the maths but I think there is an analogy with climbing a hill. The hill has a fixed height so as far as work is concerned it should be the same whatever route you take up the hill. However if you zig zag back and forth as you go up the force would be lower than taking the direct route to the top.
 
When climbing a hill work done remains constant as we do work against gravity which is a conservative force and for conservative forces work done doesn't depends on path but depends on displacement which is same for both steep climbing and zig-zag climbing.
In this case Force is different which is evident from the smoothness in separating metal and magnet through sliding and also the displacement in both the cases would be different in direction which gives different work done.
And my question is to find out a quantitative difference between these two processes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K