Different cases of work done done by 3 conservative forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the work done by three conservative forces and the implications of conservative force equations. It establishes that if a particle returns to its original position, the change in potential energy (ΔU) is zero, leading to the conclusion that the work done in one segment is equal to the negative of the work done in another. The analysis indicates that for certain cases, specific conditions on work values must hold true, with case A yielding results of q and s, while case C supports q and s but not r due to sign contradictions. The conversation also critiques the terminology of "conservative" forces, suggesting a clearer distinction based on energy forms involved. The final answers for the cases are summarized as A: q,s; B: p,q,r,s; C: q,r,s; D: p,q,r,s.
Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


WP_20150901_23_50_24_Pro.jpg


Homework Equations


W=-ΔU for conservative force.

The Attempt at a Solution


Let all three forces be conservative.
Since particle comes back to where it was, ΔU=0.
Hence ΔUAB+ΔUBC+ΔUCA=0
Hence WCA=-WAB-WBC
For case A, if both WAB, WBC>0, then WCA<0. Else its greater than zero. It is not possible for WCA=WBC because it will contradict the given statement. (Let WAB=WBC=x and other be equal to y. Then 2x=y and x=y which is not possible).
Hence for A: q,s.
Given answer: q,s

Moving onto case C, again q is true. But r can't be true since they have opposite signs. s can also be true.
Hence for C: q,s
Given answer: q,r,s
Are they considering only the magnitude?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are a student at school, this is not addressed to you.
Strictly, a force does not do work: whatever applies the force F does work and loses some of its available energy. The specified force always acts in the same direction so it cannot be responsible for the return of the particle from C to A. Some other force must be applied by some other agency to bring this about. This agency does the work on the return leg and whatever applies F has work done on it. "Doing negative work" is an unnecessary oxymoron. A negative calculated value indicates that the force in the calculation is not involved in doing work but that work is being done on whatever applies the force. One possible situation is that a spring is suspended with vertically with a mass m at the lower end. At rest, the mass is at B. The mass m is displaced through h to A and released. F = mg where g N/kg is the strength of the gravitational field. The work done by gravity to reach B is mgh and to reach C is 2mgh. This is the gravitational potential energy lost by the mass-Earth system. Beyond B the extended spring applies an increasing upward force on m and gains energy at the expense of the kinetic energy of the mass until, at C, the motion is reversed. The spring loses elastic potential energy while doing work on the mass. At B, the mass has kinetic energy and is able to do work to compress the spring and to move away from the Earth until point A is reached. Between C and A the force F, the weight of the body, does no work. Instead, the interaction that gives rise to the weight, gravity, has work done on it and gains energy. Between A and B the spring does work and loses energy. Between B and C it has work done on it and gains energy. Between C and B the spring does work and loses energy. Between B and A it has work done on it and gains energy.
Incidentally, I dislike the notion of 'conservative' and 'non-conservative' forces. All interactions conserve energy and there is nothing special about ones involving only kinetic and one or two forms of potential energy. I would rather express the question in terms of situations where only KE and PE were involved and those where other forms of energy were involved. This is slightly more wordy but much more concrete and comprehensible.
 
WCA = WBC = 2 J, WAB = - 4 J is an example for (r).
 
  • Like
Likes Titan97
How do I approach case B and D?
 
Titan97 said:
How do I approach case B and D?
I don't understand how in case B ,the given condition is satisfying q ?
 
For case B and D, apply W=ΔKE. The particle can be moved such that kinetic energy may not change.
All answers p,q,r,s satisfy B and D.
Hence
A: q,s
B: p,q,r,s
C: q,r,s
D: p,q,r,s
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top