Differential Forms Integration Exercise

kyp4
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I posted this awhile back in the homework sections of the forums and received only one reply, which suggested that I post it here instead, though I understand that it belongs in the homework section. The fundamental problem is not this particular exercise but about integration of differential forms in general. But this is best illustrated in an example and, for simplicity, I just copied the original post:

Homework Statement



The problem I am facing is 2.9 in Sean Carroll's book on general relativity (Geometry and Spacetime) I should note that I am not studying this formally and so a full solution would not be unwelcome, though I understand that forum policy understandably prohibits it. The full problem is stated as

In Minkowski space, suppose that *F = q \sin{\theta} d\theta\wedge d\phi.

a.) Evaluate d*F=*J
b.) What is the two-form F equal to?
c.) What are the electric and magnetic fields equal to for this solution?
d.) Evaluate \int_V d*F where V is a ball of radius R in Euclidean three-space at a fixed moment of time.

Homework Equations



In the above the asterisk denotes the Hodge dual and the d denotes the exterior derivative. The definitions of these operators should be well known.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have the first three parts solved. For part a.) I arrived at the lengthy result of

<br /> \frac{1}{2}[\partial_\mu(*F)_{\nu\rho} - \partial_\nu(*F)_{\mu\rho} + \partial_\nu(*F)_{\rho\mu} - \partial_\rho(*F)_{\nu\mu} + \partial_\rho(*F)_{\mu\nu} - \partial_\mu(*F)_{\rho\nu}] = \epsilon^\sigma_{\,\,\mu\nu\rho}J_\sigma<br />

For part b.) I got (with the help of my TI-89) the two-form, in matrix form,

<br /> F = -(**F) = \left[<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 0 &amp; \frac{q}{r^4 \sin{\theta}} &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> \frac{-q}{r^4 \sin{\theta}} &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp;0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right]<br />

and for c.) I arrived at, directly from part b.),

E_r = \frac{-q}{r^4 \sin{\theta}}
E_\theta = 0
E_\phi = 0

B_\mu = 0

For \mu=1,2,3.

Verification of these would be appreciated but I am especially confused about the last part d.). In particular the integrand is a three-form and I have no idea how to integrate this and how to transform the integral into a familiar volume integral that can be computed by standard multivariable calculus.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (a) I would answer in terms of ##F## rather than in terms of ##*F##, which makes things much simpler. Note that differential forms by definition are anti-symmetric so the six terms you have in the left-hand side reduce to three terms. Anyway, taking the hodge of the equation, you should find the remaining set of Maxwell's equations that are not covered by ##dF = 0##, i.e., ##\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} = J^\nu## (with possibly a sign depending on some conventions).

In terms of the integration in (d), your region of spacetime is a space-like 3-surface and so what can be integrated over it are 3-forms. In particular ##d*F## is a 3-form and can be integrated over it. In general, the integral of a ##p##-form ##\omega## over a ##p##-dimensional region ##S## parametrised by some parameters ##t_a## is given by
$$
\int_{S} \omega = \int_{S_t} \omega(\dot \gamma_1,\ldots,\dot\gamma_p) dt_1\ldots dt_p,
$$
where ##S_t## is the region in the parameters ##t_a## that describe the region ##S## and ##\dot\gamma_k## is the tangent vector to the curve parametrised with ##t_k## (while keeping all other ##t_a## constant).

You would go about doing this integral much as you do any surface integral: First parametrise the surface. In your case the surface is given by ##t = t_0## and you can parametrise the rest using your spherical coordinates with the region being defined by ##r < R##. However, it will be easier to perform the integral after applying Stokes' theorem
$$
\int_\Omega d\omega = \int_{\partial\Omega} \omega.
$$
In your case, you would use ##\omega = *F## and find that
$$
\int_V d*F = \int_S *F,
$$
where ##S## is the boundary of your ball, i.e., it is described by ##t = t_0## and ##r = R## and parametrised by ##\theta## and ##\varphi## such that
$$
0 < \theta < \pi, \quad 0 < \varphi < 2\pi.
$$
This leads to
$$
\int_V d*F = \int_{\theta = 0}^\pi \int_{\varphi = 0}^{2\pi} *F(\partial_\theta,\partial_\varphi) d\theta\,d\varphi.
$$
Since your particular form of ##*F## is ##*F = q\sin(\theta)d\theta \wedge d\varphi##, it holds that
$$
*F(\partial_\theta,\partial_\varphi) = q\sin(\theta)
$$
and therefore
$$
\int_V d*F = q \left[\int_0^\pi \sin(\theta) d\theta\right] \left[\int_0^{2\pi} d\varphi\right]
= q[2][2\pi] = 4\pi q.
$$

Note that, since ##d*F = *J##, it generally holds that
$$
\int_{\partial V} *F = \int_V *J.
$$
If ##V## is in a single moment in time, then the right-hand side essentially reduces to the integral of ##J_0## over the volume. This is just Gauss' law in electrodynamics on integral form (which should not come as a surprise since ##d*F = *J## includes Gauss' law on differential form ...).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, Dale and fresh_42
The phrasing of the exercise is a bit strange for parts (a) and (d). If you take the derivative of
##*F = q \sin\theta d\theta \wedge d\phi##, you get ##d*F = q \cos\theta d\theta \wedge d\theta \wedge d\phi = 0##. So (a) and (d) become trivial.

For (b), you made a mistake. ##F_{tr}## should be ##-\frac{q}{r^2}##. I guess that you used the Levi-Civita symbol, instead of the Levi-Civita tensor, to calculate ##**F##. The latter would give an extra factor of ##\sqrt{|g|} = r^2 \sin \theta##. So the correct answer to (c) is that we are simply dealing with a point charge ##q## at the origin.
 
axolotl said:
The phrasing of the exercise is a bit strange for parts (a) and (d). If you take the derivative of
##*F = q \sin\theta d\theta \wedge d\phi##, you get ##d*F = q \cos\theta d\theta \wedge d\theta \wedge d\phi = 0##. So (a) and (d) become trivial.

For (b), you made a mistake. ##F_{tr}## should be ##-\frac{q}{r^2}##. I guess that you used the Levi-Civita symbol, instead of the Levi-Civita tensor, to calculate ##**F##. The latter would give an extra factor of ##\sqrt{|g|} = r^2 \sin \theta##. So the correct answer to (c) is that we are simply dealing with a point charge ##q## at the origin.
:welcome:

The original post is nearly 13 years old and the original poster long gone!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes vanhees71, topsquark and malawi_glenn
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top