Differential Forms Integration Exercise

In summary, the conversation discusses a homework problem involving integration of differential forms in general relativity. The problem involves evaluating d*F = *J, finding the two-form F, and determining the electric and magnetic fields for the solution. The conversation also discusses how to evaluate the integral of a 3-form over a 3-dimensional region using Stokes' theorem.
  • #1
kyp4
19
0
Hi all, I posted this awhile back in the homework sections of the forums and received only one reply, which suggested that I post it here instead, though I understand that it belongs in the homework section. The fundamental problem is not this particular exercise but about integration of differential forms in general. But this is best illustrated in an example and, for simplicity, I just copied the original post:

Homework Statement



The problem I am facing is 2.9 in Sean Carroll's book on general relativity (Geometry and Spacetime) I should note that I am not studying this formally and so a full solution would not be unwelcome, though I understand that forum policy understandably prohibits it. The full problem is stated as

In Minkowski space, suppose that [tex]*F = q \sin{\theta} d\theta\wedge d\phi[/tex].

a.) Evaluate [tex]d*F=*J[/tex]
b.) What is the two-form [tex]F[/tex] equal to?
c.) What are the electric and magnetic fields equal to for this solution?
d.) Evaluate [tex]\int_V d*F[/tex] where [tex]V[/tex] is a ball of radius [tex]R[/tex] in Euclidean three-space at a fixed moment of time.

Homework Equations



In the above the asterisk denotes the Hodge dual and the [tex]d[/tex] denotes the exterior derivative. The definitions of these operators should be well known.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have the first three parts solved. For part a.) I arrived at the lengthy result of

[tex]
\frac{1}{2}[\partial_\mu(*F)_{\nu\rho} - \partial_\nu(*F)_{\mu\rho} + \partial_\nu(*F)_{\rho\mu} - \partial_\rho(*F)_{\nu\mu} + \partial_\rho(*F)_{\mu\nu} - \partial_\mu(*F)_{\rho\nu}] = \epsilon^\sigma_{\,\,\mu\nu\rho}J_\sigma
[/tex]

For part b.) I got (with the help of my TI-89) the two-form, in matrix form,

[tex]
F = -(**F) = \left[
\begin{array}{cccc}
0 & \frac{q}{r^4 \sin{\theta}} & 0 & 0\\
\frac{-q}{r^4 \sin{\theta}} & 0 & 0 &0\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{array}
\right]
[/tex]

and for c.) I arrived at, directly from part b.),

[tex]E_r = \frac{-q}{r^4 \sin{\theta}}[/tex]
[tex]E_\theta = 0[/tex]
[tex]E_\phi = 0[/tex]

[tex]B_\mu = 0[/tex]

For [tex]\mu=1,2,3[/tex].

Verification of these would be appreciated but I am especially confused about the last part d.). In particular the integrand is a three-form and I have no idea how to integrate this and how to transform the integral into a familiar volume integral that can be computed by standard multivariable calculus.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For (a) I would answer in terms of ##F## rather than in terms of ##*F##, which makes things much simpler. Note that differential forms by definition are anti-symmetric so the six terms you have in the left-hand side reduce to three terms. Anyway, taking the hodge of the equation, you should find the remaining set of Maxwell's equations that are not covered by ##dF = 0##, i.e., ##\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} = J^\nu## (with possibly a sign depending on some conventions).

In terms of the integration in (d), your region of spacetime is a space-like 3-surface and so what can be integrated over it are 3-forms. In particular ##d*F## is a 3-form and can be integrated over it. In general, the integral of a ##p##-form ##\omega## over a ##p##-dimensional region ##S## parametrised by some parameters ##t_a## is given by
$$
\int_{S} \omega = \int_{S_t} \omega(\dot \gamma_1,\ldots,\dot\gamma_p) dt_1\ldots dt_p,
$$
where ##S_t## is the region in the parameters ##t_a## that describe the region ##S## and ##\dot\gamma_k## is the tangent vector to the curve parametrised with ##t_k## (while keeping all other ##t_a## constant).

You would go about doing this integral much as you do any surface integral: First parametrise the surface. In your case the surface is given by ##t = t_0## and you can parametrise the rest using your spherical coordinates with the region being defined by ##r < R##. However, it will be easier to perform the integral after applying Stokes' theorem
$$
\int_\Omega d\omega = \int_{\partial\Omega} \omega.
$$
In your case, you would use ##\omega = *F## and find that
$$
\int_V d*F = \int_S *F,
$$
where ##S## is the boundary of your ball, i.e., it is described by ##t = t_0## and ##r = R## and parametrised by ##\theta## and ##\varphi## such that
$$
0 < \theta < \pi, \quad 0 < \varphi < 2\pi.
$$
This leads to
$$
\int_V d*F = \int_{\theta = 0}^\pi \int_{\varphi = 0}^{2\pi} *F(\partial_\theta,\partial_\varphi) d\theta\,d\varphi.
$$
Since your particular form of ##*F## is ##*F = q\sin(\theta)d\theta \wedge d\varphi##, it holds that
$$
*F(\partial_\theta,\partial_\varphi) = q\sin(\theta)
$$
and therefore
$$
\int_V d*F = q \left[\int_0^\pi \sin(\theta) d\theta\right] \left[\int_0^{2\pi} d\varphi\right]
= q[2][2\pi] = 4\pi q.
$$

Note that, since ##d*F = *J##, it generally holds that
$$
\int_{\partial V} *F = \int_V *J.
$$
If ##V## is in a single moment in time, then the right-hand side essentially reduces to the integral of ##J_0## over the volume. This is just Gauss' law in electrodynamics on integral form (which should not come as a surprise since ##d*F = *J## includes Gauss' law on differential form ...).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, Dale and fresh_42
  • #3
The phrasing of the exercise is a bit strange for parts (a) and (d). If you take the derivative of
##*F = q \sin\theta d\theta \wedge d\phi##, you get ##d*F = q \cos\theta d\theta \wedge d\theta \wedge d\phi = 0##. So (a) and (d) become trivial.

For (b), you made a mistake. ##F_{tr}## should be ##-\frac{q}{r^2}##. I guess that you used the Levi-Civita symbol, instead of the Levi-Civita tensor, to calculate ##**F##. The latter would give an extra factor of ##\sqrt{|g|} = r^2 \sin \theta##. So the correct answer to (c) is that we are simply dealing with a point charge ##q## at the origin.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #4
axolotl said:
The phrasing of the exercise is a bit strange for parts (a) and (d). If you take the derivative of
##*F = q \sin\theta d\theta \wedge d\phi##, you get ##d*F = q \cos\theta d\theta \wedge d\theta \wedge d\phi = 0##. So (a) and (d) become trivial.

For (b), you made a mistake. ##F_{tr}## should be ##-\frac{q}{r^2}##. I guess that you used the Levi-Civita symbol, instead of the Levi-Civita tensor, to calculate ##**F##. The latter would give an extra factor of ##\sqrt{|g|} = r^2 \sin \theta##. So the correct answer to (c) is that we are simply dealing with a point charge ##q## at the origin.
:welcome:

The original post is nearly 13 years old and the original poster long gone!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes vanhees71, topsquark and malawi_glenn

1. What is differential forms integration?

Differential forms integration is a mathematical technique used to integrate differential forms, which are mathematical objects that generalize the concept of a function or a vector field. It involves using a set of rules and formulas to find the integral of a differential form over a given region.

2. How is differential forms integration different from traditional integration?

Differential forms integration is more general and powerful than traditional integration. It allows for the integration of a wider range of mathematical objects, including functions, vector fields, and more complex geometric structures. It also uses a different set of rules and formulas, which can sometimes lead to more efficient and elegant solutions.

3. What are some applications of differential forms integration?

Differential forms integration has numerous applications in mathematics, physics, engineering, and other scientific fields. It is widely used in studying and solving problems related to vector calculus, differential geometry, and mathematical physics. It also has applications in computer graphics and computer-aided design.

4. How can I improve my skills in differential forms integration?

To improve your skills in differential forms integration, you can practice solving different types of exercises and problems. It is also helpful to have a strong understanding of vector calculus and differential geometry. Additionally, studying textbooks and attending courses or workshops can also be beneficial.

5. Are there any common challenges in differential forms integration?

One common challenge in differential forms integration is understanding and applying the various rules and formulas correctly. Another challenge is recognizing which type of differential form should be used for a particular problem. It can also be challenging to visualize and interpret the results of a differential forms integration problem.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
576
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
722
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top