Differential operator acting on scalar fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the product rule in the context of the four-vector differential operator ∂μ acting on scalar fields Aμ, φ, and φ*. The user seeks clarification on the logic behind the product rule expansion, particularly in relation to the Klein-Gordon current in an electromagnetic field. The correct application of the product rule is established as: ∂μ(Aνφφ*) = (∂μAν)φφ* + Aν(∂μφ)φ* + Aνφ(∂μφ*). The user expresses confusion about the manipulation of scalar fields and the proper use of indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-vector calculus
  • Familiarity with scalar fields and their properties
  • Knowledge of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism in field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the product rule in the context of differential operators
  • Learn about the Klein-Gordon current and its applications in quantum field theory
  • Explore the manipulation of indices in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between scalar fields and electromagnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory, electromagnetism, and differential geometry.

shedrick94
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I really cannot seem to be able to follow the logic of how you would use the product rule when using 4 vector differential operator. ∂μ is the differential operator, Aμ is a scalar field and φ and φ* is it's complex conjugate scalar field. I have the answer, I'd just really like to know how to follow the logic of the answer.

Homework Equations


μ(Aμφφ*)=...?

The Attempt at a Solution


Literally have no idea what I'm doing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A^\mu is a vector field, not a scalar field. But what is unclear about the product rule? (Note: I would not use the same index \mu for both \partial_\mu and A^\mu. I would let one of them be \nu. If you really mean for the indices to be equal, then you can set them equal at the end.)

You have a product A^\nu \phi \phi^* you're taking a derivative with respect to x^\mu. So the product rule says:

\partial_\mu (A^\nu \phi \phi^*) = (\partial_\mu A^\nu) \phi \phi^* + A^\nu (\partial_\mu \phi) \phi^* + A^\nu \phi (\partial_\mu \phi^*)
 
Yeh sorry I did mean to put that A is a scalar field. Should be a bit more explicit about the problem I'm having as I wrote that last night after spending almost all my evening on it and I had given up.

Basically the problem is to do with the klein gordon current with an electromagnetic field and part of the current is the below equation and you have to be able to recognize that the product rule expansion of what I've shown on the LHS is the RHS.

\begin{equation}
iq(\phi^{*}A_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\phi + \phi^{*}\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}\phi + \phi A_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\phi^{*} + \phi\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}\phi^{*})=2iq\phi^{*}\phi A_{\mu}
\end{equation}
ie that,
\begin{equation}
\partial_{\mu}(LHS)=\partial_{\mu}(RHS)
\end{equation}

I'm particularly struggling to understand when and where you can move the fields around. For example, are you allow to just move the scalar fields φ and φ* around wherever you please?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
663
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K