Differential operator acting on scalar fields

shedrick94
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I really cannot seem to be able to follow the logic of how you would use the product rule when using 4 vector differential operator. ∂μ is the differential operator, Aμ is a scalar field and φ and φ* is it's complex conjugate scalar field. I have the answer, I'd just really like to know how to follow the logic of the answer.

Homework Equations


μ(Aμφφ*)=...?

The Attempt at a Solution


Literally have no idea what I'm doing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A^\mu is a vector field, not a scalar field. But what is unclear about the product rule? (Note: I would not use the same index \mu for both \partial_\mu and A^\mu. I would let one of them be \nu. If you really mean for the indices to be equal, then you can set them equal at the end.)

You have a product A^\nu \phi \phi^* you're taking a derivative with respect to x^\mu. So the product rule says:

\partial_\mu (A^\nu \phi \phi^*) = (\partial_\mu A^\nu) \phi \phi^* + A^\nu (\partial_\mu \phi) \phi^* + A^\nu \phi (\partial_\mu \phi^*)
 
Yeh sorry I did mean to put that A is a scalar field. Should be a bit more explicit about the problem I'm having as I wrote that last night after spending almost all my evening on it and I had given up.

Basically the problem is to do with the klein gordon current with an electromagnetic field and part of the current is the below equation and you have to be able to recognize that the product rule expansion of what I've shown on the LHS is the RHS.

\begin{equation}
iq(\phi^{*}A_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\phi + \phi^{*}\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}\phi + \phi A_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\phi^{*} + \phi\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}\phi^{*})=2iq\phi^{*}\phi A_{\mu}
\end{equation}
ie that,
\begin{equation}
\partial_{\mu}(LHS)=\partial_{\mu}(RHS)
\end{equation}

I'm particularly struggling to understand when and where you can move the fields around. For example, are you allow to just move the scalar fields φ and φ* around wherever you please?
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top