Diffraction & Interference - interference fringes per cm

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of interference fringes observed per centimeter in reflected light from a setup involving two pieces of glass separated by a thin metal foil. The key equations used include the relationship between the thickness of the foil, the wavelength of light, and the conditions for constructive and destructive interference. The initial approach involved determining the maximum number of dark fringes using the formula for interference, leading to an estimate of 264 fringes. A subsequent analysis considered the wedge shape formed by the glass, refining the calculation to conclude that there are approximately 44 total fringes per centimeter. The final consensus indicates that the calculations align, confirming the total number of fringes observed.
Isaac Pepper
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A thin piece of metal foil of thickness 0.0700 mm separates one end of two pieces of optically flat glass. The top sheet of glass is 12.0 cm long. Light of wavelength 529 nm is normally incident on the glass. How many interference fringes are observed per cm in the reflected light?

Homework Equations


##\lambda = \frac{\lambda_0}{n}##
##2t = m\lambda## constructive or destructive depending on phase shift (where t is the thickness 0.0700mm)
##2t = (m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda##
maybe some other equations..I'm not sure!

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not really sure how to come about solving this problem, and any help would be greatly appreciated.
I don't know if I've understood the question correctly, but I'm thinking there's just a piece of metal separating two pieces of glass, and light coming in normal to the surface of the glass?

Since the refractive index of the glass is less than that of the metal foil there will be no phase shift, and then there will be a phase shift between the foil and the next piece of glass.

Am I on the right track or am I looking at it completely the wrong way?
Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isaac Pepper said:
I don't know if I've understood the question correctly, but I'm thinking there's just a piece of metal separating two pieces of glass, and light coming in normal to the surface of the glass?

There's a wedge formed by the two pieces of glass, they touch on one end, but are separated by the thickness of the foil on the other. Could have been a figure accompanying the text to make this clear. Light beams incident on the surface will travel different path lengths after having been reflected off the lower piece of glass.
 
That makes much more sense!
Therefore I need to use the formula $$2t = (m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda$$
Is that correct?
So since the distance between the top and the bottom pieces of glass won't be constant (forms a wedge), call the distance between them h, which varies.
At h=0 (where the two pieces of glace touch), there'll be a dark fringe due to phase shift,
So at m(max) I'll have the number of dark interference fringes?

Hence ##2t = (mmax+\frac{1}{2})\lambda##
$$mmax = \frac{2t}{\lambda}-\frac{1}{2} = \frac{2*0.07*10^-3}{529*10^-9}-\frac{1}{2} = 264.1$$

So say 264, do I then multiply that by 2 to get the number of light and dark fringes because it asks for the total fringes, and divide by 12, to get the number of fringes per cm?
$$264*\frac{2}{12} = 44$$

Am I correct in thinking this?

EDIT :: I'm pretty sure this is completely wrong and am currently working through a different solution
 
Last edited:
Perhaps a different way of looking at it :

Let's first work out the angle that the two pieces of glass form
$$sin\theta = \frac{0.07}{120}$$
Therefore $$\theta = 0.033$$
##cos\theta *12 = 11.999... = 12 = L## (length of the bottom piece)

##2t = m\lambda##
##\frac{h}{x} = \frac{t}{L}##
Combining the equations:
##\frac{2xt}{L} = m\lambda##

Therefore $$x=m\frac{L\lambda}{2t} = m*\frac{0.12*529*10^-9}{2*0.07*10^-3} = m*0.453mm$$

And so over 12cm there are ##453*10^-4*12*10^-2 = 264.65## fringes.
Which corresponds to my previous answer...(although I made a small mistake above)
This means 264/12 = 22 dark fringes per cm and 22 bright fringes so 44 fringes in total?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top