Diffraction of red LED light picture with spots

phrendlie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I would like to know what the dots are. This reminds me of X-ray diffraction, but I am imaging a sphere of liquid on the end of a microcapillary nozzle (2um inner diameter glass nozzle with sputtered gold outer coating on nozzle).
I am taking a picture of a small glass nozzle with a metal coating. There is a sphere of liquid at the end of the nozzle This sphere has radius ~10 to 20 um. Then I lowered the lights and took a long exposure (1 second). The lighting is a single red LED, with some overhead white lights.
The LED hits the sphere of liquid at ~120 degrees to the camera with the light coming from behind the object. By this, I mean that the light has to bend ~60 degrees within the sphere to reach the camera. The LED light is pulsing at 10 Hz.
Low light, long exposure (1 second) with overhead lights on:
upload_2015-12-17_22-28-46.png

Same, with overhead lights off:
upload_2015-12-17_22-30-59.png

Then I put a mirrored surface under the nozzle to make the image brighter (requiring shorter exposure time)
Exposure time 8 ms, no change in focus or magnification, no change in light, camera, or object position. Overhead lights off, so all light is red, nearly monochromatic:
upload_2015-12-17_22-37-42.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it helps, here is the object in better focus, but notice that my depth of focus is not even as big as the sphere of liquid:
upload_2015-12-17_23-0-25.png
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top