Dimensional Analysis Help: Understanding Correct Equations in MKS System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on determining the dimensional correctness of equations within the MKS (Meter-Kilogram-Second) system. The user presents two equations: 1) m/t=(3/2)pV/t and 2) PV=(1/2)mv²+mg(V/A), seeking clarification on their dimensional validity. The explanation emphasizes that for an equation to be dimensionally correct, the dimensional formulas of both sides must match. The discussion also illustrates how to derive dimensional formulas for various physical quantities, such as force and velocity, using the fundamental dimensions of mass, length, and time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the MKS system (Meter-Kilogram-Second)
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis and dimensional formulas
  • Basic knowledge of physical quantities such as mass, length, and time
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving physical quantities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of dimensional formulas for various physical quantities
  • Learn how to apply dimensional analysis to check the correctness of equations
  • Explore examples of dimensional analysis in fluid mechanics and thermodynamics
  • Investigate the implications of dimensional homogeneity in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and applied sciences who need to understand dimensional analysis and its application in verifying the correctness of equations in the MKS system.

hthrcru
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding what exactly a dimensionally correct equation is..here's my problem-

In the following expressions:
V-volume
A-area
P-pressure
p(lowercase)-density
t-time
m-mass
v-velocity
g-acceleration due to gravity

I'm supposed to state whether the following equations are dimensionally correct or incorrect, using the above variables in terms [L,M,t], the MKS system..

1. m/t=(3/2)pV/t

2. PV=(1/2)mv2+mg(V/A)

Can ANYONE explain to me if these are dimensionally correct or not and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
did I post this wrong or does no one know the answer? I'm new to this website so I am not sure how long it normally takes for a response!
 
All the physical quantities of interest can be derived from the base i.e. fundamental quantities [mass,length and 5 more].By dimension of a quantity[Q let] in a base quantity, we mean "the exponent of a base quantity that enters into the expression of that qunatity[Q]".
Eg:- Force = mass * acceleration = mass *(velocity/time) = mass * [(length/time)/time] =mass * length * (time)-2 => Dimensions of force are 1 in mass, 1 in length and -2 in time. It is denoted as [Force] = MLT-2 {M for mass, L for length, T for time}
And MLT-2 is called dimensional formula for Force.
->For any physical quantity, you can just go on breaking the formula to the base ones{like i did for Force}.
--->Now, for an equation to be dimensionally correct, Dimensional formula for LHS term must be same as Dimensional formula for RHS term.
>Also, if 2 terms on any side are adding or subracting, then the 2 terms must have same dimensional formula also.
>As nos [1,2,5,10.1 etc] are unitless, they don't contribute anything to dimensional formula of a term
Eg:- Let's take up one of the kinematic's equation :- S = ut - (1/2)at2
-- = L
-- [ut] = (LT-1)(T) = L
-- [(1/2)at2] = (LT-2)(T)2 = L
And hence this equation is dimensionally correct.
Eg:- Let i write :- velocity, v = aS [a for acceleration and S for displacement]
[v] = LT-1
[aS] = ((LT-2)(L) = L2T-2
clearly, both are not same and this equation i wrote is dimensionally incorrect.

Try out those You have asked, I think you will be able to do them now ^.^
Hope it help :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
873
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K