Direction of friction in rotation

AI Thread Summary
The direction of friction for a rolling object is zero unless it is accelerating or decelerating. When a ball rolls down an incline, the friction force acts upward along the surface, opposing the acceleration due to gravity. This friction helps increase the object's angular velocity while retarding its linear acceleration. In contrast, a sliding object converts some energy into heat, further reducing its acceleration. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the motion of rolling objects.
phoenixruby
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
could someone please explain the technique of how to know the direction of friction in case of rolling.

eg. when a ball is rolling down an inclined or up or hits a wall and rebounds etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the case of a rolling object, the friction force on a rolling (and not slipping) object is zero unless the object is accelerating (or decelerating). Friction force will oppose the acceleration of a rolling object, resulting in an increase in angular velocity (assuming no slippage). So if an object is being accelerated due to gravity on an inclined plane, the friction force will be along the surface of the plane, in the "upward" direction. This retards the rate of linear acceleration, since the gravitational potential energy is used to increase both the linear and angular kinetic energy of a rolling (but non slipping) object. In the case of a sliding object, some of the energy is converted into heat, also reducing the rate of acceleration.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top