What Happens to Angular Velocity When a Disc is Dropped onto a Rotating Hoop?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of angular momentum when a disc is dropped onto a rotating hoop. The initial angular momentum of the hoop is calculated, and it is noted that external forces like friction must be negligible for the conservation laws to apply. The final angular velocity is derived by equating initial and final angular momentum, leading to a calculated final angular velocity of 3.65 s-1. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct equations for rotational motion, specifically relating mass to moment of inertia. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in labeling variables to avoid confusion in calculations.
boognish
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1. A hoop with mass 2.0 kg and radius 1.5 m is rotating with initial angular velocity of 5.4 s-1. A disc with the same mass and radius is dropped on top of the hoop so that the centers coincide. What conservation law applies here? What assumptions must you make to apply it? What is the final angular velocity?



2. Kinetic energy 1 = kinetic energy 2

Ke hoop = m x v^2
ke disc = 1/2 m x v^2




3. Conservation of momentum
There must be no additional external forces like air resistance or friction

ke hoop = 2.0 kg x 5.4 s-
Ke hoop initial = 10.8 kg m s-

Now i don't know if this works like a simple collision where I would factor in the new mass of the disc placed on it... but I am sure that I would have to factor in the moment of inertia of said disc so 1/2 m x v^2 to determine the change in angular velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What conservation law applies here?
-- conservation of angular momentum.

What assumptions must you make to apply it?
-- no friction? What is holding the two objects together then?

What is the final angular velocity?
-- your stated conservation law was "momentum" so you should be using the momentum equations here and not the KE ones.

The way to tackle conservation problems is to think in terms of "before" and "after" stuff happens - ignore the "during". The math works much the same as the linear case you've done before but with the rotational equations - so mass becomes "moment of inertia" and velocity becomes "angular velocity" so ##p=mv## (linear momentum) becomes ##L=I\omega## (angular momentum)
 
Simon Bridge said:
-- no friction? What is holding the two objects together then?
Boognish did specify external forces.
 
so understanding what you have told me i think that it resolves to:

Li= m r^2 w
Li = 2.0 x 1.5^2 x 5.4-s
Li = 24.3

Lf = Li

Lf = (Ii + If) x wf

Lf = ((m R^2 + (1/2 m R^2)) x Wf

24.3 = ((2.0 x 1.5^2) + (.5 x 2.0 x 1.5^2)) x wf
wf = 3.65s-

Any thoughts?
 
haruspex said:
Boognish did specify external forces.
Oh yes, my bad. "Friction was an example of the kind of thing. Question still stands though.
Objects held together by internal forces?

@boognish: that's what I described all right.
I'd watch the labels myself though ... one may expect that Lf = If.wf where If = I(hoop)+I(disk)
You wouldn't want to do all that work and get marked down because the marker misread you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top