Dispersion relations and Plasma

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electron density in plasma surrounding a spacecraft during re-entry, which caused a radio blackout at frequencies up to 10^10 Hz. The electron density was determined to be 1.24x10^18 m^-3 using the given dispersion relation. The second part of the problem involves calculating the thickness of the plasma, where it is noted that the wave number 'k' becomes imaginary due to the frequency being below the plasma frequency, leading to exponential decay of the wave. The relationship between the amplitude decrease and the exponential function is highlighted, indicating that the amplitude of the wave decreases to 10% of its original value. The correct approach to find the thickness involves using the dispersion relation specific to plasma rather than the standard wave equation.
Moham1287
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The dispersion relation for a plasma is given by

k^{2}=\frac{\omega^{2}}{c^{2}}(1-\frac{\omega^{2}_{p}}{\omega^{2}})\omega^{2}_{p}\:= \frac{Ne^{2}}{m_{e}\epsilon_{0}}

Where N is the electron density

During re enrty of a spacecraft there was a radio blackout of all frequencies up to 10^10 Hz because it was surrounded by a plasma. Calculate the electron density in the plasma surrounding the spacecraft .

Sensitive equipment detected EM radio waves at 10^9 Hz at an amplitude of 10% of that before re entry. Calculate the thickness of the plasma.

Homework Equations



Given above

The Attempt at a Solution



Got the first part easily enough, by substituting in the expression for \omega^{2}_{p}, then solving \frac{Ne^{2}}{\omega^{2}m_{e}\epsilon_{0}}=1 for N to get N= 1.24x10^18. I don't really have any idea about how to go about the second part, I can't find anything about it in my textbook (I S Grant & W R Phillips Electromagnetism) or on the old googles

Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the frequency is below the plasma frequency your 'k' will be imaginary. That means the wave will exponentially decay. So you will have something like E = E_0*exp(-kx). And you know the amplitude is decreased by 10%, so you are left with something like... 0.10 = exp(-k*x)

Now you just solve for 'x', and that is roughly how far the wave had to attenuate through before it escaped
 
Hi

thanks for the reply. I don't think I quite follow though. K is the wave number, given by 2pi/lambda isn't it? How can that be imaginary? k would be 2pi/0.3 recurring for EM of 10^9 Hz... Would my answer then just be 0.10=exp(x2pi/0.3) solve for x?
 
The wave is in a plasma, so the dispersion relation w=ck doesn't apply anymore. Use the dispersion relation you listed above.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top