Displacement caused by Coriolis effect -

James1991
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/6590/mwsnap001.jpg

The image above shows the question I'm stuck on.

I've done the first part and got the force per unit mass to be -2wV'cos\lambda

But I have no idea how to get the equation for the eastward displacement due to the Coreolis.

Any help would be appreciated
Thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the three x,y,z equations of motion for this case?
 
I was using an equation of motion which relates the acceleration in the Earth's rotating frame and a non moving frame and i tried to intergrate it to get the answer they wanted

a = a' - 2wXv' + wX(wXx')

where a, a', w, v' and x' are vectors and X is the cross product
 
There are three equations of motion, not just one, because there are three independent directions in space. Assume that z is "up", x is due East and and y is due North from the latitude of the object. What the three equations of motion?
 
kuruman said:
There are three equations of motion, not just one, because there are three independent directions in space. Assume that z is "up", x is due East and and y is due North from the latitude of the object. What the three equations of motion?

z = 1/2gt^2

x = v^2sin2(theta)/g

pretty sure we don't need y in this case. am i along the right lines? still not sure how to get what they got using these
 
Look for differential equations. What is the general form for the acceleration in the rotating frame? What happens when you write it in component form? Yes, you will not need y in this case, but it wouldn't hurt to write all three of them and then use what you need.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top