Displacement current in Maxwell equations

snyski
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how to solve or at least how to begin solving the following problem?:

Prove that displacement current in the Maxwell equations can be neglected if characteristic time τ of changing electromagnetic field in the system satisfies to the following condition: τ >> L/c where L is the characteristic size of this system and c is light speed. (Hint: time derivative of some variable y can be approximated as ratio of its characteristic value to characteristic time, dy/dτ ≈ y/τ the similar approximation can be also used for spatial derivatives).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write down the relevant Maxwell equation, then change all derivatives in length and time to simple division by their charactersitic values?
 
I believe I can use the following relation:
img981.png



Defining the current density of J as the displacement current, by differentiating D with respect to time
ab93b5aac5ffa87badaa48f32c50715a.png



(dD/dt)We get:
8df256232f07aa711d287438280647be.png



With B and E being defined as:
57619c6a86c79e56ac806faf21502c90.png

9cab6787646062d6e658cd1e83ad468f.png



So instead of differentiating to time I can now simply divide by time? However, I don't quite see where light speed comes in and how I could prove the displacement current actually being neglectable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top