Distance and Acceleration for One Car to Catch Another

  • Thread starter Thread starter hitemup
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Car
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two cars, one traveling at a constant speed and the other decelerating, with the goal of determining the relationship between the deceleration and the initial distance to avoid a collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various equations of motion and their applicability to the scenario, questioning the complexity of the original approach and suggesting simpler relationships. There is an exploration of the necessary conditions for avoiding a crash based on the relative velocities and distances involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different perspectives on the equations to use and the relationships between variables. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of specific equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available and the methods they can use to derive their conclusions.

hitemup
Messages
81
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


[/B]
You are traveling at a constant speed vM, and there is a car in front of you traveling with a speed vA. You notice that vM>vA, so you start slowing down with a constant acceleration a when the distance between you and the other car is x. What relationship between a and x determines whether or not you run into the car in front of you?

Homework Equations



x = v0*t - 1/2*a*t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
After a time t, the distance between the cars must be something larger than x if they don't want to crash, so:

vM*t-1/2*a*t^2 - vA*t > x

t(vM-1/2*a*t-vA)>x
(vM-vA-1/2*a*t)>x/t

What should be the next step after this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you are complicating things too much. It's simple... A uniform deceleration has to cancel the relative velocity within a given distance...

And I would choose another equation...
 
we can easily find by using...
s=u+at
 
Remember: you know two things, that are enough: 1) the difference of velocity with respect to the other car Vm - Va. Let's call it U. 2) you also know the distance x to the other car when you start braking with a uniform negative acceleration a.

Thus, you should use a equation that gives a as a function of U and x... That is, acceleration as a function of velocity and space. You probably know the equation as giving velocity as a function of space and acceleration.

Just solve for acceleration...
 
NTW said:
Remember: you know two things, that are enough: 1) the difference of velocity with respect to the other car Vm - Va. Let's call it U. 2) you also know the distance x to the other car when you start braking with a uniform negative acceleration a.

Thus, you should use a equation that gives a as a function of U and x... That is, acceleration as a function of velocity and space. You probably know the equation as giving velocity as a function of space and acceleration.

Just solve for acceleration...

http://www.sketchtoy.com/63345550

I've done this. But what can be said for a and x just looking at this equation?
(vM- vA)^2 /(2a) must be less than x for cars not to crash?
 
The negative acceleration to be calculated by a = U2/2*x is exactly the necessary to avoid contact... More deceleration will equalize the speeds earlier, keeping the distance, and less deceleration would result in a crash...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
991
Replies
100
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K