Distance of ions from photographic plate

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarahaha288
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ions Plate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance from the entry point to the spot on a photographic plate for three ions (N2+, O2+, NO+) completing half an orbit in a magnetic field. The user initially attempted to use the formula R = mvc/qB but encountered errors, suspecting issues with the mass or charge values used. They calculated the mass based on atomic weights and converted to kilograms, using a standard charge value of 1.60 x 10^-19 C. Upon further reflection, they realized that the distance to the plate is actually 2R, not just R, indicating a misunderstanding in their initial approach. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics principles in ion trajectory calculations.
sarahaha288
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How far would the spot on the photographic plate be from the entry point for each ion, assuming that each ion completes half an orbit?
I am given three ions, N+subscript2, O+subscript2, NO+
They have atomic masses of N=14.0031amu and O=15.9949amu.
I am given the magnetic field strength=8.5MN/C
velocity=30.0km/s
The magnetic field is uniform and perpendicular to the velocity.

Homework Equations



I tried to use R=mvc/ qB

q is the charge, m=mass, v=speed, c=speed of light, B= magnetic field strength

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried simply substituting these in and using the standard 1.60*10^-19C for the charge. For the mass i just took the atomic mass, multiplied it by the subscript of two for the first two and then converted it to kg.
I got it wrong.. and i can't tell why.
If i could just figure out what i did I'm pretty sure it's the mass or the charge that is incorrect but i have not had chemistry in quite awhile and can't figure it out...

Thanks for all your help in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it more. Do the ions really hit the plate 1 radius away from their starting position?
 
No. I think it's 2R now. Thank you... I'm not sure how i overlooked that.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Solving Charge Across Plates of a Capacitor w/ Negative Ions
Replies
2
Views
2K
Time dependant Potential Energy in ion trap
Replies
1
Views
2K
Speed, force, magnetic flux of an ion?
Replies
13
Views
3K
Charges of ions in a mass spectrometer
Replies
1
Views
1K
Electric field generated by ions in a box
Replies
12
Views
2K
Distance between Isotopes in a mass spec
Replies
8
Views
10K
Circular Motion in a Simple Mass Spectrometer
Replies
4
Views
5K
Mass spectrometer problem -- Need help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Solving Two Charged Plates Homework: Magnetism, Frequency & Charge Density
Replies
3
Views
2K
V required so ions passing through the region don't devitate
Replies
46
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top