Distance of ions from photographic plate

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarahaha288
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ions Plate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance from the entry point to the spot on a photographic plate for three ions (N2+, O2+, NO+) completing half an orbit in a magnetic field. The user initially attempted to use the formula R = mvc/qB but encountered errors, suspecting issues with the mass or charge values used. They calculated the mass based on atomic weights and converted to kilograms, using a standard charge value of 1.60 x 10^-19 C. Upon further reflection, they realized that the distance to the plate is actually 2R, not just R, indicating a misunderstanding in their initial approach. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics principles in ion trajectory calculations.
sarahaha288
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How far would the spot on the photographic plate be from the entry point for each ion, assuming that each ion completes half an orbit?
I am given three ions, N+subscript2, O+subscript2, NO+
They have atomic masses of N=14.0031amu and O=15.9949amu.
I am given the magnetic field strength=8.5MN/C
velocity=30.0km/s
The magnetic field is uniform and perpendicular to the velocity.

Homework Equations



I tried to use R=mvc/ qB

q is the charge, m=mass, v=speed, c=speed of light, B= magnetic field strength

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried simply substituting these in and using the standard 1.60*10^-19C for the charge. For the mass i just took the atomic mass, multiplied it by the subscript of two for the first two and then converted it to kg.
I got it wrong.. and i can't tell why.
If i could just figure out what i did I'm pretty sure it's the mass or the charge that is incorrect but i have not had chemistry in quite awhile and can't figure it out...

Thanks for all your help in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it more. Do the ions really hit the plate 1 radius away from their starting position?
 
No. I think it's 2R now. Thank you... I'm not sure how i overlooked that.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top