Distribution function of an ideal gas

gdumont
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have the following problem to solve:

Consider a planet of radius R and mass M. The plante's atmosphere is an ideal gas of N particles of mass m at temperature T. Find the equilibrium distribution function of the gas accounting for the gas itself and the gravitationnal potential of the planet.

Here are my thoughts

The equilibrium function of the gas alone is simply the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function f_0(\mathbf{v}), so the full distribution is just
<br /> f(\vec{v})=f_0(\vec{v})e^{-U/kT}<br />
where
<br /> U=-\frac{GMm}{r}<br />
is the gravitational potential and r is the distance from the center of the planet to the molecule of velocity \vec{v}. I'm not sure if I should replace r by r-R in U.

Can anyone confirm if I'm right or not?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gas molecules can't penetrate into the surface of the planet, so it makes sense for your model to be described by a potential which is
<br /> U(r) = - \frac{GMm}{r} \,\,\, r &gt; R<br />
and U = \infty for r &lt; R.
 
OK, but is the distribution function OK?
 
Yes, the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is the correct one.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top