Distribution with pmf and rand. variables.

megr_ftw
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I posted this in the wrong section before and meant to put it here, so i apologize if you seen this before.

X=demand for the magazine with pmf

x | 1 2 3 4
p(x)| .1 .2 .4 .3

Shop owner pays $1.00 for each copy of mag. and charges $2.00. If mags. left at end of week are not worth anything, is it better to order two, three, or four copies of the mag.?

I know i need to introduce the random variables:
Y_k = # of mags. sold
R_k= the net profit if k mags are ordered.

I am NOT trying to just get the answer out of someone, I just need advice on how to start this..
Do I need to make another pmf for Y_k and R_k? Or do I need to figure out expected value.
just a hint may help me understand this problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like an open-ended question. First step could be to write down the profit for all 16 combinations {(1 bought, 1 sold), (1 bought, 2 sold), ...} perhaps as a 4x4 table.
 
i don't think its open ended, because R_k= -1k+2*Y_k since R_k is the profit
could i simply find the expected value is 1, 2, or 3 are sold that's it?
 
That's the open-ended part, it's up to you to choose a selection criteria. Expected value is only one of infinitely many possibilities. It's good that you've got a formula for the profit though it's important to actually look at the values and their relative probabilities (for example, with an appropriate chart) otherwise important details can be hidden.
 
Last edited:
okay the profit for k=2 i got 3.8

when i am calculating it for when k=3 is this equation correct? -1(3)+2(.1*1+.2*3.8+.4*3.8+.3*3.8)
i may be going off a longshot but i used the profit from k=2 for the values of x in this equation.

I just want to make sure I am doing k=3 right so i can figure out when k=4...
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top