Dive-bomber projectile motion problem

AI Thread Summary
A dive-bomber problem involves calculating the angle θ at which a bomb is released from an altitude of 2.15 km, hitting a target 3.30 km away. The discussion centers on using projectile motion equations to relate horizontal and vertical components of motion to find θ. Participants suggest creating two equations based on the horizontal and vertical distances traveled, allowing for the elimination of time as a variable. Through the use of trigonometric identities and the Pythagorean theorem, the angle can be derived from the known distances. Ultimately, the problem emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics principles to solve for the angle of release.
jessedevin
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A dive-bomber has a velocity of 230 m/s at an angle θ below the horizontal. When the altitude of the aircraft is 2.15 km, it releases a bomb, which subsequently hits a target on the ground. The magnitude of the displacement from the point of release of the bomb to the target is 3.30 km. Find the angle θ.

Homework Equations


xf=xi+1/2(vxi +vxf)*t
xf=xi+vxi*t+1/2a*t2
vxf2= vxi2+2*a(xf-xi)
vf = vi + a*t
vxi= vi*cos(θ)
vyi= vi*sin(θ)
h= vi2*sin2 (θ)/(2g), g= gravity constant 9.8 m/s2, h= max height
R= vi2*sin(2θ)/g, R=max horizontal range


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to do this by creating a triangle and using angle laws to find θ, where I did θ=tan-1(2.15/3.30), but that's wrong. I just can't visualize how to start this problem. If someone can just give me a hint on starting the problem, then maybe i can attempt to get a solution. I need help asap! Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No one can help me out? Not even how to start?
 
You know the horizontal and vertical components of initial velocity depend on the angle of the plane. Now you have to use the info about the magnitude of the displacement to find the angle. You should come up with two equations (one for the horizontal and one for the vertical component of motion) that will have two unknowns. You can then eliminate one of the unknowns and solve for the angle.
 
Kurdt said:
You know the horizontal and vertical components of initial velocity depend on the angle of the plane. Now you have to use the info about the magnitude of the displacement to find the angle. You should come up with two equations (one for the horizontal and one for the vertical component of motion) that will have two unknowns. You can then eliminate one of the unknowns and solve for the angle.

The horizontal component of velocity is vxi= vi*cos(θ) and the vertical component of velocity is vyi= vi*sin(θ), so vxi=230cos(θ) and vyi=230sin(θ). I am up with you until that part. But how would you relate that with the magnitude of displacement. I am really confused. Please elaborate please!
 
If we create a big triangle from the point of release, the hypotenuse I think will be 3.30 km. The altitude, or y, of when the bomb is released is 2.15 km, and judging by the question, θ is the angle at which the bomb hits the target. This is the way I am visualizing it. Is this the way you are looking at it? And how would the components of velocity help find θ?
 
The only time the angle appears is when the question states the plane makes the angle below the horizontal. You're then asked to find the angle (i.e. the angle the plae is at wrt the horizontal.

Ok so you have the velocities. Now what equations describe how far the bomb travels in each direction?
 
Kurdt said:
The only time the angle appears is when the question states the plane makes the angle below the horizontal. You're then asked to find the angle (i.e. the angle the plae is at wrt the horizontal.

Ok so you have the velocities. Now what equations describe how far the bomb travels in each direction?

Well, we have the equations xf=xi+vxi*t+1/2a*t2 to describe the horizontal postion of the bomb and yf=yi+vyi*t+1/2a*t2 to describe the vertical position of the bomb. This thing we need to find out time t when the bomb hits the target, but how do we do that?
 
Last edited:
The x postion eqn will have no acceleration, and we can substitute vxi with vi*cos(θ), but we still have a problem with t. For the y position, we can substitute the acceleration with the gravity constant and vyi with vi*sin(θ), but again is there a substitution we can make for t? I was thinking of the formula vf = vi + a*t, where we can say the final velocity is 0, so we can say t= -vi/a, but for the x postion, a=0, so I am still stuck. Am I even in the right direction to solve this problem?
 
Sticking with the distance equations, if we knew the horizontal or x distance traveled we would have two equations with two unknowns (time and angle), we could then eliminate one of the unknowns and find the other. Can you think of how we can work out the horizontal distance travelled? (hint: think about the displacement given)
 
  • #10
jessedevin said:
The x postion eqn will have no acceleration, and we can substitute vxi with vi*cos(θ), but we still have a problem with t. For the y position, we can substitute the acceleration with the gravity constant and vyi with vi*sin(θ), but again is there a substitution we can make for t? I was thinking of the formula vf = vi + a*t, where we can say the final velocity is 0, so we can say t= -vi/a, but for the x postion, a=0, so I am still stuck. Am I even in the right direction to solve this problem?

What again is the displacement? And what is displacement?

They say Total displacement, so that means displacement in x and y taken together. Any ancient Greeks that come to mind?

If you know 2 sides of a triangle how do you find the third?
 
  • #11
Kurdt said:
Sticking with the distance equations, if we knew the horizontal or x distance traveled we would have two equations with two unknowns (time and angle), we could then eliminate one of the unknowns and find the other. Can you think of how we can work out the horizontal distance travelled? (hint: think about the displacement given)

LowlyPion said:
What again is the displacement? And what is displacement?

They say Total displacement, so that means displacement in x and y taken together. Any ancient Greeks that come to mind?

If you know 2 sides of a triangle how do you find the third?

We should use the pythagrean thrm, in which:
x= \sqrt{}3.32-2.152 = 2.50 km
So now we know x= 2.5 km, y=2.15 km, and the displacement = 3.3. But how does this eliminate one of the varibles, in this case t, for the position equations?
 
  • #12
For the x-axis manipulate the equation so t is the subject. Substitute t in the y-axis equation and then you have a single equation with only one unknown, the angle. Solve for the angle.
 
  • #13
jessedevin said:
We should use the pythagrean thrm, in which:
x= \sqrt{}3.32-2.152 = 2.50 km
So now we know x= 2.5 km, y=2.15 km, and the displacement = 3.3. But how does this eliminate one of the varibles, in this case t, for the position equations?

Well for one thing you now know that Vx*t = 2.5km.
 
  • #14
Kurdt said:
For the x-axis manipulate the equation so t is the subject. Substitute t in the y-axis equation and then you have a single equation with only one unknown, the angle. Solve for the angle.

I tried that, also keeping in mind that i changed the units from m to km for all distances, and I got:
xf=xi + vxi*t +1/2*a*t^2, but the 1/2*a*t^2=0 because a=0, so I got t= xf/vxi, which equals t= xf/(vi*cos(θ)). When I put in numbers, I get t= 10.9/cos(θ).
Then I use the yf=yi+ vyi*t +1/2*a*t^2, and substitute in for t.
I get:
0= 2.15 +.23sin(θ)(10.9/cos(θ))-1/2(9.8)(10.9/cos(θ))^2
But I still cannot solve for θ.

Do you have any other suggestions? Am I doing this right?
 
  • #15
Ok you're now going to have to do some trig substitutions to see if you can get a quadratic in tan theta. Then solve the quadratic. Careful with your signs.
 
  • #16
Kurdt said:
Ok you're now going to have to do some trig substitutions to see if you can get a quadratic in tan theta. Then solve the quadratic. Careful with your signs.

I tried it on my ti-89 also and it couldn't even solve it! What to do ? Any advice from anyone else? LowlyPion... HELP! lol
 
  • #17
I'm afraid that's what you have to do unfortunately. Its a standard solution that you're obviously first encountering. Have a look at these trig identities and try and get all tans in you equation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_identity

It will then be a quadratic in tan and quadratics are easy to solve using the quadratic formula. :smile:
 
  • #18
jessedevin said:
I tried that, also keeping in mind that i changed the units from m to km for all distances, and I got:
xf=xi + vxi*t +1/2*a*t^2, but the 1/2*a*t^2=0 because a=0, so I got t= xf/vxi, which equals t= xf/(vi*cos(θ)). When I put in numbers, I get t= 10.9/cos(θ).
Then I use the yf=yi+ vyi*t +1/2*a*t^2, and substitute in for t.
I get:
0= 2.15 +.23sin(θ)(10.9/cos(θ))-1/2(9.8)(10.9/cos(θ))^2
But I still cannot solve for θ.

Do you have any other suggestions? Am I doing this right?

Careful. Better leave things in meters. Or change your g = 9.8 to km.
 
  • #19
LowlyPion said:
Careful. Better leave things in meters. Or change your g = 9.8 to km.

Okay i did that and still cannot get an answer? Do you have any tips on a different way to solve this problem? Its due tommorrow so if you could really help I would appreciate it!
 
  • #20
Have you tried making the equation all tan thetas and solving the quadratic? If you're looking for someone to give you the answer then this is not the forum. I gave you pretty much everything you need to work with. If you're having trouble with a final answer post your working so far and we can see if you've made any mistakes.
 
  • #21
Kurdt said:
Have you tried making the equation all tan thetas and solving the quadratic? If you're looking for someone to give you the answer then this is not the forum. I gave you pretty much everything you need to work with. If you're having trouble with a final answer post your working so far and we can see if you've made any mistakes.

Ill show you exactly what i did; I am not asking you to give me the answer just a way to get the right answer!:

x2+y2= displacement2
x2=3.32-2.152= 6.27 km
x= 2.50 km --> 2500 m.
vxi= vi*cos(θ) = 230*cos(θ)
vyi=vi*sin(θ)= 230*sin(θ)
xf= xi +vi*cos(θ) +1/2*a*t2 , 1/2*a*t2=0, because a=0
2500= 0 + 230*cos(θ)*t
t=10.9/cos(θ)
yf= yi + vi*cos(θ) - 1/2*g*t2
0= 2150 + 230*sin(θ)(10.9/cos(θ)) -.5(9.8)(10.9/cos(θ))2

Do you have any way to solve for θ? Did I do any calculations wrong? Please Help!
 
  • #22
You're fine up until then. Now refer to my posts #15 and #17. If there is anything you don't understand in them, just ask and I'll clarify. Can you get tan thetas in you equations using the trig identities page I linked you to? What is tan theta defined as for example?
 
  • #23
I got θ = 91.5 or θ=6.72, is that what you got?
 
  • #24
Thanks for the help! I finalllllllllllllllllly got it! lol Thanks for the help
 
  • #25
jessedevin said:
Thanks for the help! I finalllllllllllllllllly got it! lol Thanks for the help

Congratulations then.

Cheers.
 
Back
Top