Do I Need the Acceleration Force for a Loop de Loop Diagram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarahaha288
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
AI Thread Summary
In creating a free body diagram for a loop de loop, it is essential to include the downward forces of gravity and the normal force, while the acceleration force is not necessary. A free body diagram should illustrate all individual forces acting on the object, without including net force or acceleration. The vector sum of these forces equals mass times acceleration, which is crucial for understanding motion. For a net force diagram, downward vectors for normal and gravitational forces are appropriate, but it is important to consider centripetal acceleration as well. Overall, accurately representing forces is key to analyzing the dynamics of the loop de loop.
sarahaha288
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
When making a free body diagram of a loop de loop i know that the downward force of gravity and the downward normal force are acting on it, and it is the acceleration force that works upward. But in the diagram is the acceleration force needed?

and also, in a net force diagram do you illustrate the acceleration force there? because without it then the net force would be going downward, which is obviously not that case. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you make a free body diagram just include all the individual forces. In your example include the normal force of the track on the cart traveling in the loop and the weight of the cart. You don't need net force or acceleration on a free body diagram.

After you have your forces the vector sum of those is equal to the mass times the acceleration of the object you drew the diagram for.
 
thanks that helps a lot for the free body diagram, but for the net force diagram i will then have to vectors pointing downward for the normal and the gravitational force. So then would the net force be pointing downward as well? or do i include something about centripital acceleration in there?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top