Do you list a publication (in a REU application) if ?

AI Thread Summary
Listing a publication where your name appears, even if your contribution was minimal, is generally advisable. It is important to be able to articulate your specific contributions, such as producing plots and results, especially when discussing your work in applications or statements of purpose. The convention for authorship varies by field; in many cases, the primary author is the first author or the first two authors, while some disciplines list authors alphabetically. In collaborative fields, the focus tends to be on prominent researchers rather than individual contributions, which can alleviate concerns about being mistaken for a primary author. When including this publication in a curriculum vitae, it is acceptable to list it as is, but clarity about your role can be beneficial.
tim_lou
Messages
682
Reaction score
1
Should I list a publication if the paper has my name in there but I didn't actually write anything in the paper? (except producing some plots and results). Particularly when the professor just put my name there as a sort of "courtesy"?

If so, how do I specify that I am not the primary author or do I just leave it as it is. What about in curriculum vitae?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should mention your specific contributions in your statement of purpose that you send to the REU.
 
tim_lou said:
Should I list a publication if the paper has my name in there but I didn't actually write anything in the paper? (except producing some plots and results). Particularly when the professor just put my name there as a sort of "courtesy"?

If so, how do I specify that I am not the primary author or do I just leave it as it is. What about in curriculum vitae?

Thanks for the help.

If the paper has your name on it, then you should list it. Now, whether you have a significant contribution to it is a different matter. You should, at the very least, be able to defend the portion that you are responsible for. Your professor is correct in including your name in the paper even if all you did was to produce some work that gave him the result.

For most subject areas, the "primary author" is usually the first author of the paper, or the first two authors of the paper. Some journals even allow for the designation of more than one authors who share equal primary contribution. So in such cases, who is the primary author is well-known. But in other areas, such as when there's a huge list of collaborators, such as an experimental high energy physics paper, the authors are listed alphabetically. Here, I don't think you need to worry about people confusing you for a primary author, mainly because the people in the field will only focus on the "brand-name" principle investigators out of the large group of people. There may even be a designated spoke person for that group.

Zz.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top