Does back pressure give incorrect flow reading?

AI Thread Summary
Back pressure can lead to incorrect flow readings in digital peak flow meters, particularly when comparing devices with different constrictions. A tighter constriction yields a higher flow rate due to increased velocity and static pressure differential, but this may not reflect accurate measurements without accounting for the nozzle coefficient. The conversion of differential pressure to flow rate relies on an ideal nozzle equation, which must be adjusted for real-world applications. Each nozzle design requires specific calibration to ensure accurate flow measurement, as factors like flow necking can significantly impact results. Accurate flow measurement necessitates thorough testing of each nozzle design in a calibrated system.
CadisEtramaDiRaizel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have to build a digital peak flow meter. I have two models based on calculations ( ideal). I have noticed that the flow rate on the model with a tighter constriction has a greater value than that of a much broader constriction. While testing it out, i noticed air resistance from the first model ( tighter). The second one has almost no resistance. So, does back pressure give an incorrect reading>
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is the airflow sensor in the constriction?
 
CWatters said:
Is the airflow sensor in the constriction?

No, it is attached to nozzles present on each side of the constriction.
Untitled1.png
 
Fluid dynamics isn't my subject but...

How do you convert differential pressure to flow rate?

If two devices with different constrictions give different results that suggests to me the possibility of an error in the way the conversion is done.
 
CWatters said:
Fluid dynamics isn't my subject but...

How do you convert differential pressure to flow rate?

If two devices with different constrictions give different results that suggests to me the possibility of an error in the way the conversion is done.
flow = a2*sqrt(2*ΔP/(density*(1-pow((a2/a1),2))));

where Q is the flowrate, ΔP is the pressure difference between the two nozzles, A1 and A2 the outer and inner diameters respectively, and ρ the density.

A higher reading was observed with a smaller constriction.
 
First, the above equation is clearly only for a theoretically ideal nozzle because the one factor absolutely mandatory in every real world application flow measurement nozzle equation is the nozzle coefficient (actual measured vs ideal) of each nozzle's particular design.

As to your original question, the smaller the second section diameter the higher the velocity in that section and greater the differential between the velocity in the two sections; therefore, the greater static pressure differential as well. The "a2/a1" factor in the equation varies correspondingly to normalize the measurement between the two flow velocity conditions.

With regard to relative accuracy, the effects on flow of a given nozzle design can affect the flow and pressure differential of that nozzle, for example, flow necking at the small diameter entrance, and as a result nozzle designs can not be scaled based strictly on a given configuration, the actual nozzle coefficient for each nozzle design must be established by flow testing in a calibrated flow testing system of that individual nozzle design, including its entry and small areas ratio.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top