Does integration give area between graph and x axis?

AI Thread Summary
Integration calculates the area between a curve and the x-axis, but the interpretation depends on the curve's position relative to the axis. For definite integrals, the area is bounded by vertical lines at x=a and x=b, and the horizontal line at y=0. If the curve lies below the x-axis, the area is counted as negative, effectively subtracting from the total area. Thus, while the term "area under a curve" is commonly used, it implicitly assumes the area is above the x-axis unless specified otherwise. Overall, integration provides a signed area, reflecting the curve's position relative to the x-axis.
CAH
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Does integrating find the area between the curve and x-axis (regarless of it being a smile/frown or any other graph)?
I've heard people say its the area UNDER a curve...
but then how would you even get a definit answer surely it may be infinite if there's no restrictions?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When people call it the area "under a curve", there is still the implicit assumption that it is above the x axis.

For a definite integral from a to b, you would be calculating the area of a region bounded as follows:

On the left by the vertical line defined by x=a
On the right by the vertical line defined by x=b
On the bottom by the horizontal line defined by y=0
On the top by the graph of the function.
 
Note that if the curve is below the x-axis then this area is counted with a minus sign
 
If it's below the x-axis is it calculating the area above the curve, between the curve and the x-axis above it
 
As jk22 pointed out, the areas of any regions where the graph is below the x-axis count as subtractions from the total area, not as additions. If the entire graph is below the x-axis then the entire area will be counted as negative.

But yes, other than this concern about the sign of the result, it is calculating the area above the graph and below the x axis.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top