Does Normal Force change with new Force diagram?

AI Thread Summary
In analyzing the forces acting on a skier being pulled up a 15° incline, the discussion focuses on the normal force (FN) and its relationship to the gravitational force (FG) and tension (FT). The free-body diagram initially places FG at 270°, FN at 105°, and FT at 15°, but a rotation of the diagram leads to a new configuration with FG at 255°, FN at 90°, and FT at 0°. The key question revolves around whether the normal force should be expressed as +mgcosθ or just +mg, with clarification that FyN equals +mgcosθ. The importance of understanding the trigonometric components of forces in relation to their angles is emphasized, particularly in forming a right triangle for accurate calculations. Overall, the discussion highlights the necessity of correctly interpreting force diagrams and applying trigonometric principles.
PacFan01
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
All degrees are measured from the positive x-axis.

FG = Force of gravity
FN = Normal force
FT = Force of tension

Problem:

A skier is being pulled up a 15° incline by a rope. I'm solving for FT. The only forces acting on the skier are FG, FN, and FT.

Attempt at a solution:

Initially, my free-body diagram shows the FG at 270°, FN at 105°, and FT at 15°.

Let's say I redraw my free-body diagram such that FG points at 255° FN at 90°, and FT at 0° (or 360°).

FyG =-mgcosθ. What I want to know is, does my FyN = +mgcosθ, or just +mg?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the angle is 90 degrees, what's cosine of 90 degrees?

Make sure you don't just blindly apply equations, you must know where those equations come from. If you rotate your diagram, changing the "theta", your equations must necessarily take this into account.
 
  • Like
Likes oldspice1212
Thanks for the reply, Matterwave.

I understand what you are saying. It's hard for me to look at a straight line (like in the case of FG at 270°) and apply trigonometric values.

I can see that if we correlate sinθ with the y-axis, and cosθ with the x-axis, that FG at 270° = mgsinθ where sin(270°) = -1, thus we typically refer to FG as -mg, associating the negative sign with the direction of gravitational acceleration.

Thus, the answer to my question is FyN = +mgcosθ.
 
I understand what you are saying. It's hard for me to look at a straight line (like in the case of FG at 270°) and apply trigonometric values.

Think to yourself... What is the component of FG that acts in the FT direction? and what is the component of FG that acts at 90 degrees to FT. Draw these it on your diagram and you will see they form a right angle triangle. Only then apply the trig.

Personally I don't think redrawing the diagram rotated 15 degrees makes it easier to understand.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top