Does the discharge coefficient of an injector depend on the fluid?

AI Thread Summary
The discharge coefficient, which compares actual discharge to ideal discharge, is influenced by the orifice shape and the fluid's Reynolds number. While an orifice with a rounded inlet approaches a coefficient of 1.0, a square edge inlet typically has a coefficient around 0.61 at high Reynolds numbers. The discharge coefficient is not constant across all incompressible fluids; it varies based on fluid density and behavior. Therefore, if a fluid does not behave like water, its discharge coefficient will differ from that measured with water. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate fluid dynamics analysis.
Austin_Tx_Rockets
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
If one were to experimentally measure the discharge coefficient using water, would this value be constant for all incompressible fluids?
The discharge coefficient is the ratio of the actual discharge to the ideal discharge and can be measured experimentally. If one were to experimentally measure the discharge coefficient using water, would this value be constant for all incompressible fluids?

What does the discharge coefficient depend on, and is it unique to every fluid?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The discharge coefficient is a function of the shape of the orifice and the fluid Reynolds number. An orifice with rounded inlet will have a discharge coefficient approaching 1.0, an orifice with a perfect square edge inlet will have the coefficient approximately 0.61 at high Reynolds numbers. Good search terms to learn more are orifice discharge coefficient and reynolds number. The image below shows the relationship between the discharge coefficient of a square edge orifice with the Reynolds number:
Discharge coefficient.jpg

The discharge coefficient of a specific orifice is unique to the exact shape of the orifice and the Reynolds number.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes gmax137 and Lnewqban
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top