Does the Fourier Series of a Continuous Function Converge Uniformly?

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
So I'm working this HW problem, namely

Suppose f is a continuous function on \mathbb{R}, with period 1. Prove that

\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=1}^{N} f(\alpha n) = \int_{0}^{1} f(t) dt

for every real irrational number \alpha.

The above is for context. The hint says to "Do it first for f(t)=\exp(2\pi ikt),k\in\mathbb{Z}," and I have done so. I supposed that the hint pointed to using the Fourier series for f. My question is: since f is continuous, may I assume that the Fourier series for f converges uniformly to f? [I recall something about the Gibbs phenomenon that made me ask.]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My PDE book says that you may conclude that the Fourier series for f converges uniformly to f on [a,b] if:

1.) f, f', and f'' are all continuous on [a,b] and,
2.) f satisfies the boundary conditions.

So continuity of f alone is not sufficient to establish uniform convergence.
 
I agree with the main point of your post Tom. That is, that

Tom Mattson said:
continuity of f alone is not sufficient to establish uniform convergence.

But what boundary conditions are we talking about in condition 2. ?! Is this said in the context of the Sturm-Liouville equation that has cos(2\pi nx/(b-a)) and sin(2\pi nx/(b-a)) as its eigenfunctions? Namely, if f satisfies the same boundary conditions as the ones associated with the sturm-liouville equation that has cos(2\pi nx/(b-a)) and sin(2\pi nx/(b-a)) as a basis for its solutions, and satisfies condition 1., then the Fourier serie of f converges uniformly to f on [a,b].

What I said might not make perfect sense as I didn't do a lot of Sturm-Liouville, but I find it really fascinating.
 
Last edited:
Specifically, what are necessary and sufficient conditions that the Fourier series for f:

i. actually converge to f ?

ii. be uniformly convergent ?

iii. both i and ii ?
 
Did I interpet the hint correctly then? (Or are Fourier series not the way to go?)
 
benorin said:
Specifically, what are necessary and sufficient conditions that the Fourier series for f:
i. actually converge to f ?
ii. be uniformly convergent ?
iii. both i and ii ?

I found it uncomfortable quoting myself, but... I did. Anyhow,

A sufficient condition for (ii) is... if f is a periodic entire function of period 2*pi, then the [usual] Fourier series for f converges uniformly on every horizontal strip containing the real axis.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top