Does the Lorentz equation preserve causality?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the implications of the Lorentz equation on causality in the context of two observers, S and S', moving relative to each other. It establishes that if two events occur simultaneously in observer S, they will not be simultaneous in observer S' unless they occur at the same location. The relationship between the spatial separation L and the time separation T is crucial for determining if the order of events can switch, with a focus on maintaining a positive time interval. The consensus is that the Lorentz transformation preserves causality, meaning that if a causal relationship exists between events in one frame, it remains intact in another. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct form of the Lorentz equations to analyze these relationships.
silenzer
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Observer S' moves at a speed u compared to observer S in x-direction. Two events happen on the x-axis of S, with the coordinates x1 and x2 at times t1 and t2 measured in S. Let L = x2-x1 and T = t2-t1.

a) If the events happen at the same time in S, does the same apply to S'? b) What relationship must there be between L and T for the order of the events become switched? c) Let there be a causal relationship between the events. Can the order seem different in S'?

Homework Equations



The Lorentz equation t = (gamma) * ( t' + x' * u / c^2 )

The Attempt at a Solution



a) The answer to this is no, because they happen at varying units of x. If they had happened at the same location, the answer would be yes.

b) Not really sure, other than to have the product on the right in the parentheses be larger than t', resulting in a negative time for t. Only thing is, I don't know what that means in terms of the Lorentz equation...

c) Obviously no.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's assume that T > 0. Then, in (b), T' < 0. Find what T' is, and see what it takes for it to be negative, assuming T is positive.
 
You need to use both Lorentz equations, not just one of them. And you need to use the version where x' and t' are expressed in terms of x and t (rather than the other way around).

Chet
 
silenzer said:
c) Obviously no.
I think you're meant to show that the Lorentz transformation preserves causality.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top