- #1
francis20520
- 19
- 5
- TL;DR Summary
- Paradox puts objectivity on shaky footing (https://science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6506/889 )
Here is the article: https://www.sciencemagazinedigital....cle.action?articleId=1611119#articleId1611119
If 2 experimenters (or people) cannot agree on a single observation does this mean that science which depends on many observers agreeing on "observing" the same thing (objectivity, reproducibility etc) is meaningless and doomed?
Because science relies on measurements and facts. If according this paper, facts and measurements are relative then how can science continue as "science"?? What will happen to the saying "facts are hallowed"?
Does this mean that science can never find what "reality" is? That objective reality is beyond the possibility of science?
What does this research papers outcome imply to scientific facts like "electrons exist", "electrons mass is so and so" etc?
If 2 experimenters (or people) cannot agree on a single observation does this mean that science which depends on many observers agreeing on "observing" the same thing (objectivity, reproducibility etc) is meaningless and doomed?
Because science relies on measurements and facts. If according this paper, facts and measurements are relative then how can science continue as "science"?? What will happen to the saying "facts are hallowed"?
Does this mean that science can never find what "reality" is? That objective reality is beyond the possibility of science?
What does this research papers outcome imply to scientific facts like "electrons exist", "electrons mass is so and so" etc?