Dog vs Raft relativity momentum Question (PLEASE HELP)

AI Thread Summary
A dog weighing 10 kg walks 8 m towards the shore on a frictionless raft that weighs 40 kg, initially 20 m from shore. The problem involves calculating the dog's final distance from the shore after halting, which is determined using momentum conservation principles. The correct approach involves considering the relative motion of the dog and the raft, leading to the conclusion that the dog ends up 13.6 m from shore. Confusion arises from switching reference frames and incorrectly applying displacement equations. The final calculation confirms that the dog is indeed 13.6 m from the shore after accounting for the raft's backward movement.
jeremygogan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A dog of mass 10 kg is standing on a raft so that he is 20 m from shore. He walks 8 m along the raft towards shore and then halts. The raft has a mass of 40 kg, and we can assume that there is no friction between the raft and the water. How far is the dog from shore when he stops? [Answer: 13.6m


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i can work out the solution by utilizing the momentum of the dog raft and then implement in into the vector addition no problem however according to my teacher no matter which way i explain how I've done it i am wrong. I know that the momentum of the dog / raft scenario works out to mass of the dog times the displacement divided by the mass of the raft is the same as the displacement of the raft backwards. you then take the two displacements, find their sum, minus that from the original distance. this results in 13.6m. not a problem, however there is apparently a flaw in my logic somewhere. apparently i am supposed to take the 20m and place it into the dog raft displacement equation before i solve for the momentum peice. PLEASE ANYONE WHO CAN HELP, IT WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jeremygogan said:
the momentum of the dog / raft scenario works out to mass of the dog times the displacement divided by the mass of the raft is the same as the displacement of the raft backwards. you then take the two displacements, find their sum, minus that from the original distance. this results in 13.6m.

Show exactly how you think you solved the problem. I'm not quite sure what you are saying here so I can't tell you if you did something wrong.
 
let D=displacement vector

dog D ground = dog D raft + raft D dog

use the momentum of the dog and the raft to solve for one unknown variable

P=P'
let m1=dog, m2=raft
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1'+m2v2'

momentum before is equal to zero

0 = m1v1'+m2v2'
-m2v2'=m1v1 v=d/t
-m2d2'/t=m1d1'/t times both sides by time
-m2d2'=m1d1'
-d2=m1d1'/m2
-d2=10*8/50
d2= -1.6m

now put this back into the original equation

dog D ground = dog D raft + raft D dog
dog D ground = 8m + (-1.6m)
dog D ground = 6.4m

now minus this from the original 20 and it gives you the 13.6m
 
I think your displacement equation is what is causing the confusion. For me you are switching reference frames way too many times. Here's how I would get a displacement equation.

The speed of the raft in the dog's reference frame, Vr-d, is equal to the speed of the dog in the shore's reference frame, Vd-s, minus the speed of the raft in the shore's reference frame, Vr-s. In equation form:

Vr-d = Vd-s - Vr-s

Multiplying through by time we get

Dr-d = Dd-s - Dr-s

Each side only uses one reference frame. Your equation uses two different frames on one side. How did you derive it?

Continuing the problem my way...

First consider an observer on the shore. By conservation of momentum the observer must see
10vdog=-40vraft

Consequently,

vraft = -1/4vdog

Now consider the dog's reference frame. To him the raft is moving by at a speed of:

vdog + 1/4vdog = 5/4vdog

He stops when he sees 8 m of raft go by, given by:

5/4vdogt = 8

t = 6.4/vdog

Obviously the time interval is the same for the observer. He sees the dog move forward by

vdog*6.4/vdog = 6.4 m = 20 - x

x = 13.6 m
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top